An amazing example of the contrarian mindset. Martin goes on and on claiming that Frazier's estimate of the length of the bag must be correct. Therefore, by direct implication, Oswald must have carried a bag of that length into the TSBD. It didn't vanish into thin air. But Martin "couldn't care less what he did" with that bag! LOL. Why? Because no such bag was ever found in the TSBD or ever accounted for in any way. Oswald himself denied carrying any such bag. He says that he carried only his lunch sack. Something we know is a lie because Martin's own witness, Frazier, confirms that he specifically asked Oswald about his lunch that morning and Oswald confirmed he didn't bring it. In addition, no one else who had access to the 6th floor ever explained why the long bag was there. It appears to be a singular such bag in that building with no work-related purpose for being there. It has Oswald's prints on it. There is zero doubt that this is the bag Oswald carried into the building that morning but because we don't have a time machine to confirm it, Martin can play the endless contrarian. It's embarrassing. Like watching some UFO nut try to contrive a narrative that proves little green men visited Earth in Ancient times.
Martin goes on and on claiming that Frazier's estimate of the length of the bag must be correct. An amazing and typical LN misrepresentation of the facts.
Therefore, by direct implication, Oswald must have carried a bag of that length into the TSBD. Indeed. A far better conclusion, supported by evidence, than the LN version, where because Oswald's print (amongst those of others) was found on a bag (made from TBSD materials) at he place where he worked, it means that must be the bag he brought into the building.
It didn't vanish into thin air. But Martin "couldn't care less what he did" with that bag! LOL. Why? Because no such bag was ever found in the TSBD or ever accounted for in any way. No search for such a bag was ever conducted in the TSBD and if the bag did not contain the rifle (something which Richard and his ilk still can not prove it did) then it doesn't matter what he did with the bag he carried into the building.
Oswald himself denied carrying any such bag. He says that he carried only his lunch sack.Which would mean that he most certainly didn't carry the bag found at the TSBD, but Richard prefers to ignore that.
In addition, no one else who had access to the 6th floor ever explained why the long bag was there. More misrepresentation. There is no record of all the people who had access to the 6th floor ever being asked about the bag! Richard just makes up the claim as he goes along.
It appears to be a singular such bag in that building with no work-related purpose for being there. It appears?.... Pffff
It has Oswald's prints on it. There is zero doubt that this is the bag Oswald carried into the building that morningAnd there it is; Oswald's prints were on a bag found at his place of work and never mind there were other prints on it as well, this must be the bag Oswald carried into the building. Richard showing off his ever present propensity for jumping to conclusions based on absolutely nothing at all.
but because we don't have a time machine to confirm it, Martin can play the endless contrarian.If you think we need a time machine to confirm it, then it's beyond obvious that you have understood fully that you do not have the evidence to confirm it in a normal way. Pathetic.
