This gets to the CTs' expectation of absolute proof. As if a new eyewitness wouldn't be ripped a new one by the kooks if that witness said the paper bag package could have contained a rifle. Some won't accept anything LN unless it was captured on Hollywood movie film; that's why a good many of them believe their CT claims and "corrupt" officials because Oliver Stone made them appear "real" in his "JFK" reenactments.
Wrong. Stone could only dream of the questions I've asked and that you can't even try to answer without using words like kook. And why read all that other stuff like Case Closed? They just repeat the Warren Report only Vinso used 3 times as many pages to say it.
It's extremely unlikely that anything new will appear in the case. LNers would welcome it more than CTs regardless of which way it went. Scientific advances in forensics ballistic reconstructions and 3D analysis by professionals and experts happened to support the LN findings. Naturally the CTs ignored that new data, so they're willingness to accept something new depends entirely on its value to assassination conspiracy theory.
Blah blah...the old stuff was never really addressed and that's what I posted above. Carrying this rattling sack of alleged apparatus into the building ...Oswald presumably entered this void of some sort where he was not seen or heard by anyone.
Hide under your cloak of platitudes with your -could have beens, maybes, possiblys, woulda, coulda.
Face it---you can't straight answer the question. Why do you even try?
Go back to your silly pathetic doodling.
