WhoWhatWhy article on the case

[Michael Walton]

Good article. It's nice to see an article where I've been saying the same thing a million times and over and over - that's today's problems with this country can be rooted back to 11/22/63.

https://whowhatwhy.org/politics/government-integrity/why-were-revisiting-the-jfk-assassination/

It's also mind-blowing how there are people out there who believe in UFOs, the world is flat, and other nonsense yet have a hard time with just asking questions about the official conclusion. As always, I believe it's strictly a biased thought process.

[Jerry Organ]

Good article. It's nice to see an article where I've been saying the same thing a million times and over and over - that's today's problems with this country can be rooted back to 11/22/63.

https://whowhatwhy.org/politics/government-integrity/why-were-revisiting-the-jfk-assassination/

It's also mind-blowing how there are people out there who believe in UFOs, the world is flat, and other nonsense yet have a hard time with just asking questions about the official conclusion. As always, I believe it's strictly a biased thought process.

Our Tracy has a fact-based rebuttal to WhoWhatWhy ( Link ). It's on a topic heading here at the Forum, so you didn't need to start a new topic.

But here's some background on the site WhoWhatWhy. It's founder is Russ Baker, a one-time left-leading journalist who published a book critical of the Bush Family (which today would just as easily place him in the Trump camp). Wikipedia reports:

    "A Columbia Journalism Review profile observed that his [Baker's]
     critics reject his view that mainstream journalism fails to dig, say that
     'reporters are warned not to go farther than the evidence warrants,
     and they say that what Baker sees as audacity is just a cover for
     sloppy reporting.'"

    "In March 2010, he [Baker] appeared before the 'Treason in America
     Conference,' a gathering of Sept. 11 truthers. Baker said the 9/11
     commission had 'no credibility,' and 'sounded open to the possibility
     that 9/11 was an inside job.' In 2014, he addressed a conference of
     the Assassination Archives and Research Center on the 'role of the
     Warren Commission on the cover-up.' He has appeared frequently
     on the Coast to Coast AM radio show, hosted by George Noory."

The MediaBias site claims both "WhoWhatWhy" and "Coast to Coast AM" traffic in pseudoscience.

WhoWhatWhy "Mixed for factual due to the promotion of pseudoscience and stories that sometimes have limited sourcing. (M. Huitsing 7/26/2017) Updated (7/22/2021)"

Coast to Coast AM "The subject matter usually covers bizarre topics followed by personal stories related to callers, junk science, pseudo-experts and non-peer- reviewed scientists."

This is among the type of "media" wholeheartedly embracing "JFK Revisited".

[Robert Reeves]

It's founder is Russ Baker, a one-time left-leading journalist who published a book critical of the Bush Family (which today would just as easily place him in the Trump camp).

Your smearing people you disagree with as supporting Trump put you firmly in the Bill O'Reilly camp

[Jack Nessan]

Kennedy's throat was restricted by the collar band and neck tie, so the exit wound didn't burst its edges. This was demonstrated years ago by Lattimer firing a Carcano into soft-tissue mock-ups.

Sorry, not seeing much from the "MSM" on the scale of "JFK Revisited". Maybe the occasional "special" from CBS, ABC or NBC on one of those deci-anniversaries, and lately it's been in the form of "where were you that day". PBS has had a few science-based programs that have a few decades between them.

The "MSM" today is the right wing media and their pseudoscience websites that endorse "Revisited" and produce nothing but propaganda pieces.

You must understand Jerry, you are not thinking clearly, there were two entrance wounds, throat and back, and no exit wounds. Bullets traveling at high velocity just went into JFK and stopped and never exited, nor were they ever found in JFK. Probably ice bullets or some other spy type thing.

[Jerry Organ]

You must understand Jerry, you are not thinking clearly, there were two entrance wounds, throat and back, and no exit wounds. Bullets traveling at high velocity just went into JFK and stopped and never exited, nor were they ever found in JFK. Probably ice bullets or some other spy type thing.

LOL! Anything but a 6.5mm MC bullet.

The one found at Parkland was planted to frame 'Lil' Lee. Or there happened to a person treated there that morning who happened to have a MC bullet in his pocket that fell out or it unknowingly had been in his rolled-up pants cuff.

[Jack Nessan]

LOL! Anything but a 6.5mm MC bullet.

The one found at Parkland was planted to frame 'Lil' Lee. Or there happened to a person treated there that morning who happened to have a MC bullet in his pocket that fell out or it unknowingly had been in his rolled-up pants cuff.

A way better explanation than the jacketed bullet went through JFK and went into the only place it could have, the person sitting in directly in front of him. How could that possibly be true?

The bullet falling out of someone's rolled up pants cuff makes way more sense.
----------------

I don't know if you are aware that there was a witness standing approximately 300 feet away on the other side of Houston Street, who claimed to have seen a gunman standing in a window on the 6th floor of the TSBD.

This witness, while blowing smoke up his wife's ass about seeing the gunman, was able to identify the caliber of the rifle, something that usually can only be done by reading the information on the barrel itself. Quite a feat from 300 feet away. He also could clearly identify over four feet of the person through a 2 -and 1/2- foot opening plus could see over 3 foot of wall above the gunman's head. All of this while another witness who was on that same floor in the TSBD at the time saw no one in that very spot. Believe his name was Rowland.