That is his story. It is odd that Tague just happens to have a preexisting cut to his face. Photos taken afterward apparently often confuse that wound for the alleged wound during the assassination. Why would he allow anyone to take photos of the preexisting wound that has nothing to do with the assassination? He ducked behind the overpass when the shooting began. Maybe he caused this wound while doing that and thought it was related to the assassination. It just seems extremely unlikely - but not impossible - that a bullet fragment fired at the JFK car ends up wounding Tague given his position at the time. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but it just seems unlikely that no one along the parade route was hit by a bullet fragment but Tague standing a couple streets over is wounded. Is there any confirmation from Buddy Walthers that he saw the blood? There were apparently pictures taken of the wound but I've also never seen them.
Mr. HAYGOOD. Yes. There was another one came up who was located, at the time he stated, on the south side of Elm Street back toward the triple underpass. Back, well, it would be north of the underpass there, and said he had gotten hit by a piece of concrete or something,
and he did have a slight cut on his right cheek, upper portion of his cheek just to the right of his nose.Mr. BELIN. Would he have been to the front or to the back of the Presidential…
