Are these two photos legit?

[Alan Ford]

Mr. Pat Speer has suggested that this running man may in fact be Agent James W. Powell:



 

[Walt Cakebread]

Maybe Ten-Watt is using this scan of the Powell slide:



It has a lot of diffusion in the white areas, making the strip above Williams appear to be thicker. The windows and white trim on the shaded side of the building have a glow.

This one not so much glare in the white areas:



This Allen photo, taken after both Dillard and Powell, show little change in the window strip that was above Williams in the Dillard photo.

 

THE POWELL PHOTO




THE ALLAN PHOTO

[John Iacoletti]

And still no answer from the contrarian brothers as to why anyone would be moving boxes around after the assassination.  Continued deflection.

Still no answer from Strawman “Smith” what his evidence is that Oswald was on the sixth floor at 12:30 and how he got down to the second floor in 75 seconds without being seen or heard by any of the 12 people along the way.

[Richard Smith]

Endless insults is right!.... Why do you continue to insult people with your utter nonsense ?.....Even a little kid would know that some of the stuff you present is utter rubbish.....and yet you apparently think we are all so stupid that we would believe your BS.   Now that's a real insult....

Can you show us a photo that shows no assassin in the 6th floor window at 12:30?  That is apparently your standard of proof despite having at least six different witness who confirmed a person in that window at the moment of the assassination along with fired bullet casings found by that window.  You suggest, however, that a photo is necessary to prove this.  The same mislogic applies to any claim that there was no one in the window at that moment.  So we await your photo. 

[Walt Cakebread]

Can you show us a photo that shows no assassin in the 6th floor window at 12:30?  That is apparently your standard of proof despite having at least six different witness who confirmed a person in that window at the moment of the assassination along with fired bullet casings found by that window.  You suggest, however, that a photo is necessary to prove this.  The same mislogic applies to any claim that there was no one in the window at that moment.  So we await your photo.

Can you show us a photo that shows no assassin in the 6th floor window at 12:30?

Yes!! It's the Dillard Photo , and  it's been posted hundreds of times......  The problem with the Powell  / Dillard photos is:.... Folks simply will not believe their eyes....

Tom Dillard snapped the photo DURING the shooting  ( the first shot got his attention , just as the first shot alerted officer Marrion Baker )  Dillard looked up, just as Baker had looked up, and Dillard saw a man behind a fifth floor window (BRW) and he snapped the shutter.   What Dillard captured on film was the FACT that there was NOBODY aiming a rifle out of that sixth floor window at that time.

As the title for the thread asks..... "Are these two photos  legit"    The answer is YES indeed they are....And they speak volumes.

The FBI kept the Powell photo hidden from us for over ten years.    Ask yourself WHY ?   

I believe the answer is because it reveals the truth ....  When comparing the shadows in the Powell and Dillard Photos,  The shadows from the sun reveal that the Powell photo was taken BEFORE the Dillard photo.    The sun doesn't lie....but men do.

I'm sure many of you will immediately respond to my allegation with  " but that doesn't make any sense!"   ...Why would Powell take a photo of the TSBD BEFORE the murder?     My reply is:   For the same reason they used the Back Yard photo...... It seems to show the patsy Lee Oswald with the murder weapon.

I ask you to open your eyes and LOOK at the Powell photo...... Is there anything in that photo that could be used as "proof" that the killer fired a rifle from that sixth floor window? 





 

[John Iacoletti]

Can you show us a photo that shows no assassin in the 6th floor window at 12:30?

LOL. There he goes again, trying to shift the burden.

That is apparently your standard of proof despite having at least six different witness who confirmed a person in that window at the moment of the assassination

More “Richard” BS. Name them.

[Walt Cakebread]

Maybe Ten-Watt is using this scan of the Powell slide:



It has a lot of diffusion in the white areas, making the strip above Williams appear to be thicker. The windows and white trim on the shaded side of the building have a glow.

This one not so much glare in the white areas:



This Allen photo, taken after both Dillard and Powell, show little change in the window strip that was above Williams in the Dillard photo.

It has a lot of diffusion in the white areas, making the strip above Williams appear to be thicker. The windows and white trim on the shaded side of the building have a glow.

Watta pile of BS.... If " diffusion" is what made the white strip "thicker" in the Powell photo then it would be even thicker in the Allan photo....

[Walt Cakebread]

The table shows the sun position from 12:20-12:40. Azimuth changes almost 6 degrees over this short time span, while altitude changes very little. The animation simulates a view similar to Powell’s view. There is no noticeable change in the window shadow over this time period. I don’t know why there is an apparent difference between Dillard and Powell, but it is not due to sun position the best I can tell.

Thanks for posting the table, James.

The table shows that the vertical angle to he sun changed little during the twenty minutes ( 12:20 - 12:40 ) but the white strip beneath the bottom of the window sash above BRW's head  definitely shows a noticeable change when comparing the Powell and Dillard photos.

And the "experts" tell us that the two photo were taken just seconds apart....   I'm sure the sun doesn't lie....