Are these two photos legit?

[Jake Maxwell]

The “single” box on the left that appears to be close to the window opening in Dillard still looks “disturbing"...

Nonetheless... this film frame you’ve provided from Alyea is very, very convincing that the boxes were “glistening” in the sun... like they are in Powell...

[Charles Collins]

The “single” box on the left that appears to be close to the window opening in Dillard still looks “disturbing"...

Nonetheless... this film frame you’ve provided from Alyea is very, very convincing that the boxes were “glistening” in the sun... like they are in Powell...

The box that I think you are referring to in Dillard is the single box on top of the stack of boxes that are well inside the window. It is the same box that can be seen in the Alyea image near the standing detective’s left shoulder. It didn’t move in any of the three images. The reason it appears to have moved (relative to the window opening) in the Powell photo is due entirely to the different angles the two photos were take from. Remember that Powell was almost one-hundred feet east of Dillard’s position in the camera car.

Whoever wrote that analysis apparently didn’t fully understand the true angle of the sun or the positions of the boxes or the angles from which the two photos were taken.

[John Iacoletti]

If you think they were right, show us. Otherwise, you are just being your usual self and contributing nothing of substance.

The substance is this:  LN evangelists will twist themselves in knots, and apply all kinds of double standards in order to cherry-pick the stuff that they think supports their narrative.  This is just one of the more transparent examples.

[John Iacoletti]

What are you suggesting happened?  That fantasy conspirators rushed into action in the moments after the assassination to move around some boxes then made their escape down the bat pole to the bat cave?

The suggestion is pretty obvious when you're not Strawman "Smith".  If somebody was up there moving boxes within seconds of the shooting when the Narrative has Lee high-tailing it over to the staircase and down the stairs, then the LN fantasy story goes up in smoke.

[Charles Collins]

The substance is this:  LN evangelists will twist themselves in knots, and apply all kinds of double standards in order to cherry-pick the stuff that they think supports their narrative.  This is just one of the more transparent examples.

What the heck are you trying to say? This is an example of someone who doesn’t have a clue trying to make the other clueless people think that someone moved some boxes. Now, again, if you think otherwise, show us.

[Charles Collins]

Rich, ain't it?

CT Fruitcake Claim		What the Govt. panel or LNer Actually Did
The Govt. or MIC, etc. supresses all evidence that might work in Oswald's favor		The HSCA believed in 1978 there was rearrangement of boxes in Dillard/Powell, and published it.
LNers believe everything the Govt. and agencies say		Using science, 3D, etc., LNers reject the 1978 HSCA claim of box-shifting

It should be obvious to anyone that Blakey and some of his recruits in the HSCA had an agenda to attempt to implicate the mob in the assassination. Look at what they came up with (acoustics sham, etc). When their sham was shown to be a sham it made them look rather silly. If the HSCA photographic experts really did claim the boxes were moved in the time between these photos, they look even sillier than the acoustics experts who said there was a 95% chance of a grassy knoll shooter based on the audio tapes. 

And the silliest of all was Blakey and those in the committee who agreed with him. Thankfully, there were some who disagreed and published their dissent as part of the report…. 

[John Iacoletti]

What the heck are you trying to say? This is an example of someone who doesn’t have a clue trying to make the other clueless people think that someone moved some boxes. Now, again, if you think otherwise, show us.

The HSCA photo panel determined that the boxes were moved between the two photos.  If you want to characterize them as clueless, that's fine with me -- as long as you apply that consistently to their other analyses, such as with the backyard and autopsy photos.

[Charles Collins]

The HSCA photo panel determined that the boxes were moved between the two photos.  If you want to characterize them as clueless, that's fine with me -- as long as you apply that consistently to their other analyses, such as with the backyard and autopsy photos.

They were not only clueless. They were lazy and they had an agenda.

You are being ridiculous regarding generalizing. Each analysis must be considered individually.

Again, if you think that they are correct, then please, please, please show us just how they got it right.