This should convince every LN'er

[Steve Barber]

If you look at these two photos you can see the face. Then if you go back to the top you'll the the face in those photos.

  You cannot sanely say that you see the a human face among all that grain and gobbledegook.  Stuff like this would be laughed out of the courtroom, along with the person who took it there to attempt showing it reveals a persons face.   Jake Maxwell takes everyone for a fool by posting this stuff.  When people fall for it...Well...enough said.

[Jim Hawthorn]

You need to look at how Dale Myers mathematically/scientifically disproved Gary Mack's "Badge Man" theory.  It isn't a person, unless they are several yards behind the fence standing on a ladder.

Do you have a link for that please?

[Steve Barber]

Do you have a link for that please?

  Yessir.    https://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/badgeman.htm

[Jim Hawthorn]

  Yessir.    https://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/badgeman.htm

Thank you sir!

[Jim Hawthorn]

Yes, looking at the Myers debunking, Badgeman (and the one presented on this thread) can be dismissed.
In fact, look again at the Moorman photo, it's plainly obvious that any gunman's line of fire from behind the picket fence would be obscured by the white wall. They would have needed some pretty magic bullets to shoot over it, then down to JFK's head.



So what to make of Arnold's account? Weird.

[Richard Smith]

This should link to an online copy... I think the best I’ve seen...

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-L83z3F_FExo/T9O4z82JSfI/AAAAAAAABpM/utf4KJ0h5zU/s2500/Mary-Moorman-Photo.jpg

And UNGER’S Gallery Copy...

https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/displayimage.php?album=11&pos=24


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jake-  Have you ever been to Dealey Plaza?  If so, you would realize that the backside of the picket fence provides no cover whatsoever for an assassin.  It is wide open to half of Dallas.  A person standing there could be seen from a mile away.  That alone makes it extremely unlikely that anyone would choose that location to assassinate JFK.  The perspective from Elm St. shown in most pictures gives the false impression that this area offers seclusion for an assassin to fire the shots when just the opposite is true.  Regardless, those blurry pictures provide no evidence of the presence of anyone. 

[Steve Barber]

Thank you sir!

 You're welcome, Sir 

[Mark A. Oblazney]

WARNING!
You will see it... then you can’t NOT see it...

getting....... triggered...........must call duncan..........   help