Lee Oswald--- The biggest "Red Herring" in American history!

[John Iacoletti]

Very silly.  Oswald wanted historical credit not legal responsibility for his act.  He had no intention of helping the authorities send him to the electric chair.  He had no idea that he had less than 48 hours to live after the assassination.  For all Oswald knew, he had years to tell the world the truth.  It was the only card that he still held to avoid being sentenced to death.  He was not going to give that away until he had legal counsel and an opportunity to cut a deal.

"Richard" fancies himself a Lee Oswald channeler.

[Sean Kneringer]

Again, I cited evidence confirming that red circles were used on Dallas buildings for fire safety purposes including the 1941 newspaper article that makes reference to them.  Again, whether you believe that the use of the red circles for fire safety is useful or not for their intended purpose is not relevant to that issue.  The fact remains that they were so used.  I am not a historian of Dallas fire safety requirements that can trace the entire history of use of red circles.  That is not necessary for the limited purpose of this context.  We know with absolute certainty that such red circles were used for fire safety purposes.  End of story.

This photo was taken in March 1962. Enlarge the photo and you'll see that the circles are in the windows. Amazing how the conspirators knew that Kennedy would be traveling through Dealey more than a year later. 

[Walt Cakebread]

This photo was taken in March 1962. Enlarge the photo and you'll see that the circles are in the windows. Amazing how the conspirators knew that Kennedy would be traveling through Dealey more than a year later. 

Where is the date on the photo?    Tress in full leaf in March?

[Sean Kneringer]

Where is the date on the photo?    Tress in full leaf in March?

March 16th, to be exact. And notice the "Carraway" sign above the entrance. That alone tells you it's well before the assassination.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth618976/m1/1/

[Walt Cakebread]

March 16th, to be exact. And notice the "Carraway" sign above the entrance. That alone tells you it's well before the assassination.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth618976/m1/1/

I don't doubt that the photo was taken prior to 1//22/63.....  ( the latticed brickwork has not yet been erected in front of the TSBD windows ) but that doesn't mean that the photo is authentic.  Photos are altered all of the time ....

[John Mytton]

I don't doubt that the photo was taken prior to 1//22/63.....  ( the latticed brickwork has not yet been erected in front of the TSBD windows ) but that doesn't mean that the photo is authentic.  Photos are altered all of the time ....

Photos are altered all of the time ....

In every topic this happens CT's demand evidence and when evidence is provided;
photos are altered all the time,
cops always lie, remember George Floyd,
Lineups are unreliable,
Eyewitness testimony can/can't be relied upon,
The FBI can't be trusted because of Hoover.
The FBI forensic experts can be trusted, just because,
Marina lied except when she didn't,
The Autopsy doctors lied except when they don't.
Yawn.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Not nearly as often as the “Oswald did it” faithful rattling off a list of claims based on speculation and calling it “evidence”.

[Richard Smith]

In every topic this happens CT's demand evidence and when evidence is provided;
photos are altered all the time,
cops always lie, remember George Floyd,
Lineups are unreliable,
Eyewitness testimony can/can't be relied upon,
The FBI can't be trusted because of Hoover.
The FBI forensic experts can be trusted, just because,
Marina lied except when she didn't,
The Autopsy doctors lied except when they don't.
Yawn.

JohnM

It is the endless Catch 22 of lunacy.  A CTer makes a baseless and absurd claim.  When this is pointed out to them, they request evidence to rebut their claim.  When that is provided, they reject the evidence as faked (without providing a scintilla of evidence that it is faked much less who and how it was faked).  Even if the evidence preexisted the assassination by years or even decades it is deemed suspect.  The baseless claim is then repeated impervious to facts, common sense, evidence, or logical inference.