Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? | FRONTLINE

[David Von Pein]

Are you so stupid that you can't see that he was sent to Russia by the US government?

To quote from one of Mr. Cakebread's recent posts above:

What a mountain of BS!

(Walt thinks LHO was "sent to Russia by the U.S. Government".)

[Walt Cakebread]

To quote from one of Mr. Cakebread's recent posts above:

What a mountain of BS!

(Walt thinks LHO was "sent to Russia by the U.S. Government".)

(Walt thinks LHO was "sent to Russia by the U.S. Government".)

Yes, I sure do.... And if you didn't have your head in the sand....You would know it also.

[John Iacoletti]

And then when you follow Oswald's actions and movements on November 21st and 22nd in 1963, the JFK case practically solves itself.

Only to somebody blinded by confirmation bias.

[Bill Chapman]

Only to somebody blinded by confirmation bias.

Plenty of confirmation on Patton
Plenty of bias shown by poor dumb Oswald

[Martin Weidmann]

Even though it is the truth. No spin is even necessary. Just following Oswald's life provides the answer. And then when you follow Oswald's actions and movements on November 21st and 22nd in 1963, the JFK case practically solves itself.

But, as we all know by now, Cakebread is allergic to something known as "the truth".

BTW, the video of "Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald?" in the OP presents only half of the documentary. Here's the whole thing:

http://dvp-video-audio-archive.blogspot.com/2012/03/who-was-lee-harvey-oswald.html

Even though it is the truth. No spin is even necessary.

How in the world would you even know it's the truth or not? Did you know Oswald and were you there, or do you just believe the story they have told you?

Just following Oswald's life provides the answer.

"Documentaries" like this are for the largest part merely window dressing to create a negative impression about Oswald, which makes it easier to conclude that he must have been the lone shooter. For the actual killing of Kennedy, it makes no difference where the killer has been in his life yet in this case they make a big deal out of his trips to Russia and Mexico etc.

And then when you follow Oswald's actions and movements on November 21st and 22nd in 1963, the JFK case practically solves itself.

Which is precisely what all this information about Oswald's life is supposed to do. The reality is that none of us really knows what's actually true about Oswald's life story that's being told and what isn't. The mere fact that they need this kind of "background information" tells me that without it they simple can not make their lone gunman case against Oswald.

[Walt Cakebread]

Even though it is the truth. No spin is even necessary.

How in the world would you even know it's the truth or not? Did you know Oswald and were you there, or do you just believe the story they have told you?

Just following Oswald's life provides the answer.

"Documentaries" like this are for the largest part merely window dressing to create a negative impression about Oswald, which makes it easier to conclude that he must have been the lone shooter. For the actual killing of Kennedy, it makes no difference where the killer has been in his life yet in this case they make a big deal out of his trips to Russia and Mexico etc.

And then when you follow Oswald's actions and movements on November 21st and 22nd in 1963, the JFK case practically solves itself.

Which is precisely what all this information about Oswald's life is supposed to do. The reality is that none of us really knows what's actually true about Oswald's life story that's being told and what isn't. The mere fact that they need this kind of "background information" tells me that without it they simple can not make their lone gunman case against Oswald.

The mere fact that they need this kind of "background information" tells me that without it they simple can not make their lone gunman case against Oswald.

Well said Mr Weidmann.....  Just one simple fact demolishes all the "documentaries" and aspersions and mud slinging they can present.  That simple fact is:..... Lee Oswald was in the 1st floor lunchroom at the time President Kennedy passed by the TSBD.

If he was a wife beater, or a communist, or excellent marksman are all immaterial....He was in the 1st floor lunchroom at the time.

[John Iacoletti]

It’s what people like DVP trot out as “evidence” when they don’t have actual evidence.

[Jerry Freeman]

  And then when you follow Oswald's actions and movements on November 21st and 22nd in 1963, the JFK case practically solves itself.   

Speculation as usual.

(Walt thinks LHO was "sent to Russia by the U.S. Government".)

So did the Soviets.