Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?  (Read 49739 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #360 on: June 01, 2022, 05:16:58 PM »
Advertisement
'Gotta keep on keeping' on'-- Joe Frazier

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #360 on: June 01, 2022, 05:16:58 PM »


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #361 on: June 01, 2022, 05:32:05 PM »
You're watching "Richard" desperately trying to divert attention away from his stupidy.

He is making bogus claims left, right and center and can't back any of them up with evidence.

And then the fool expects to be taken seriously..... It's really beyond pathetic.

So again no substantive response or explanation of your "chain of custody" claim.  It is all commentary and personal insults.  And I'm the one trying to "divert attention."  LOL.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #362 on: June 01, 2022, 05:39:24 PM »
How about we try this one at a time to avoid going down every contrarian rabbit hole?

Was the revolver in evidence used to kill Tippit?  It seems like the answer has to be yes regardless of whether you are a LNer or CTer because it was either used by Oswald to do so or was planted on him to link him to that crime.  It would make no apparent sense to plant a gun that wasn't used in the crime to frame someone.  But what say the contrarian?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #362 on: June 01, 2022, 05:39:24 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #363 on: June 01, 2022, 05:57:27 PM »
So again no substantive response or explanation of your "chain of custody" claim.  It is all commentary and personal insults.  And I'm the one trying to "divert attention."  LOL.

How about we try this one at a time to avoid going down every contrarian rabbit hole?

Was the revolver in evidence used to kill Tippit?  It seems like the answer has to be yes regardless of whether you are a LNer or CTer because it was either used by Oswald to do so or was planted on him to link him to that crime.  It would make no apparent sense to plant a gun that wasn't used in the crime to frame someone.  But what say the contrarian?

Poor little "Richard"... So desperately trying to get out of the mess he has gotten himself into.

And still no names of the officers who "Richard" claims can confirm that a revolver was taken from Oswald at the TT and that it was CE143.....

LOL

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #364 on: June 01, 2022, 06:39:08 PM »
How about we try this one at a time to avoid going down every contrarian rabbit hole?

Was the revolver in evidence used to kill Tippit?  It seems like the answer has to be yes regardless of whether you are a LNer or CTer because it was either used by Oswald to do so or was planted on him to link him to that crime.  It would make no apparent sense to plant a gun that wasn't used in the crime to frame someone.  But what say the contrarian?

The weapon used to kill Tippit is indeterminate. There were insufficient characteristics on the bullets to identify a specific gun.

Next BS claim?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #364 on: June 01, 2022, 06:39:08 PM »


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #365 on: June 01, 2022, 08:48:28 PM »
Poor little "Richard"... So desperately trying to get out of the mess he has gotten himself into.

And still no names of the officers who "Richard" claims can confirm that a revolver was taken from Oswald at the TT and that it was CE143.....

LOL

What is with the constant commentary and insults?  How about trying to have a discussion?  This is not a trick question.  Was the gun in evidence used to kill Tippit? 

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #366 on: June 01, 2022, 09:17:26 PM »
What is with the constant commentary and insults?  How about trying to have a discussion?  This is not a trick question.  Was the gun in evidence used to kill Tippit?

How about trying to have a discussion?

This, coming from you, is the joke of the week.

You want to know what the problem is with the chain of custody? You being unable to name the officer(s) who took a revolver from Oswald and your inability to show that CE143 is the revolver that was allegedly taken from Oswald. That is the problem with the chain of custody.

Now, after you can not back up your bogus claims with any evidence, you suddenly want a "discussion"? For what? So you can argue until hell freezes over that it somehow doesn't matter that you can't name the officers and that you are right anyway? No thank you, I'm not wasting my time on that. Even more so, as your posting history reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are utterly incapable to have a discussion, as that requires the answering of questions and you won't or can't even answer a basic question.

Now, go back to just repeating your usual BS, because that seems to be the only thing you are good at.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2022, 10:36:43 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #367 on: June 02, 2022, 03:32:10 AM »
McDonald gives the gun to Carroll..

then, after leaving the theater and taking Oswald to the cop shop:



...good so far  ;D


--------
BONUS
--------
« Last Edit: June 02, 2022, 03:48:29 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?
« Reply #367 on: June 02, 2022, 03:32:10 AM »