Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?

[Jerry Freeman]

Our resident contrarians remind me of Inspector Clouseau:  "I believe everything and I believe nothing. I suspect everyone and I suspect no one."  In which they imply over and over and over that the evidence is faked/planted but then deny they have suggested a conspiracy.  It is just so.  There is no explanation.  Not even an attempt.  Just shout "chain of custody" and Oswald's revolver vanishes.  Disregard that Oswald confirmed that he had a gun, that DPD officers took it from him, that there are pictures of it being carried from the TT and that there are documents that the same gun in evidence was ordered using an alias associated with Oswald and sent to his PO Box.  But then deny that they are suggesting the evidence is fake.  Or anyone has suggested a conspiracy (ie strawman).  Refuse to state what exactly they are suggesting.  Round and round we go down the rabbit hole.

Oh listen to you
That entire rabbit hole post is a total deviation from the subject of this thread.
  "Oswald confirmed that he had a gun..."
When did a dead man tell you this?

[Martin Weidmann]

Oh listen to you
That entire rabbit hole post is a total deviation from the subject of this thread.
  "Oswald confirmed that he had a gun..."
When did a dead man tell you this?

You're watching "Richard" desperately trying to divert attention away from his stupidy.

He is making bogus claims left, right and center and can't back any of them up with evidence.

And then the fool expects to be taken seriously..... It's really beyond pathetic.

[John Iacoletti]

The jig is up, “Richard”. Until you can demonstrate — with evidence, not your usual litany of BS claims — that CE143 was taken from Oswald in the theater, run along and let the grownups talk.

[Bill Chapman]

'Gotta keep on keeping' on'-- Joe Frazier

[Richard Smith]

You're watching "Richard" desperately trying to divert attention away from his stupidy.

He is making bogus claims left, right and center and can't back any of them up with evidence.

And then the fool expects to be taken seriously..... It's really beyond pathetic.

So again no substantive response or explanation of your "chain of custody" claim.  It is all commentary and personal insults.  And I'm the one trying to "divert attention."  LOL.

[Richard Smith]

How about we try this one at a time to avoid going down every contrarian rabbit hole?

Was the revolver in evidence used to kill Tippit?  It seems like the answer has to be yes regardless of whether you are a LNer or CTer because it was either used by Oswald to do so or was planted on him to link him to that crime.  It would make no apparent sense to plant a gun that wasn't used in the crime to frame someone.  But what say the contrarian?

[Martin Weidmann]

So again no substantive response or explanation of your "chain of custody" claim.  It is all commentary and personal insults.  And I'm the one trying to "divert attention."  LOL.

How about we try this one at a time to avoid going down every contrarian rabbit hole?

Was the revolver in evidence used to kill Tippit?  It seems like the answer has to be yes regardless of whether you are a LNer or CTer because it was either used by Oswald to do so or was planted on him to link him to that crime.  It would make no apparent sense to plant a gun that wasn't used in the crime to frame someone.  But what say the contrarian?

Poor little "Richard"... So desperately trying to get out of the mess he has gotten himself into.

And still no names of the officers who "Richard" claims can confirm that a revolver was taken from Oswald at the TT and that it was CE143.....

LOL