Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?

[Richard Smith]

But they did anyway.
The investigation of the president's murder and also the policeman was legally the responsibility of the Attorney General of Texas.
LBJ could not afford to have that.
Mentioned is Jack Ruby. He provided to the Report- his own account of his whereabouts during those days.
The Commission accepted Ruby's self declared alibis even though they were all obvious lies and contradicted by other persons.Not mentioned is could someone actually hit anything at the required distance.https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/appendix-12.html
Just like the FBI said he did.

That's odd logic.  There was no legal obligation by the federal government to conduct ANY investigation into the assassination. The fact that they conducted an extensive investigation when none was legally required suggests that rather than attempting to cover up anything that they were seeking to shed light on the event.  Nothing that the WC did precluded Texas or the AG from continuing to investigate the crime.  They, however, were satisfied, based on the overwhelming evidence, that LHO was responsible for the crime.  A conclusion that has is unchanged until today.  As a result, there was nothing for them to investigate.

[Jerry Freeman]

That's odd logic.  There was no legal obligation by the federal government to conduct ANY investigation into the assassination. The fact that they conducted an extensive investigation when none was legally required suggests that rather than attempting to cover up anything that they were seeking to shed light on the event.  Nothing that the WC did precluded Texas or the AG from continuing to investigate the crime.  They, however, were satisfied, based on the overwhelming evidence, that LHO was responsible for the crime.  A conclusion that has is unchanged until today.  As a result, there was nothing for them to investigate.

That's really odd logic.
How do you know who was "satisfied"?

based on the overwhelming evidence

Be "overwhelmed" if it makes you happy.

[Bill Chapman]

The way Richard Smith is ganged up on reveals just how big a problem he is to Oswald arse kissers.

[Richard Smith]

That's really odd logic.
How do you know who was "satisfied"?Be "overwhelmed" if it makes you happy.

How do I know that the Texas authorities were satisfied that Oswald assassinated JFK?  They said so based on the evidence.  Why do you think the WC somehow precluded the Texas authorities from pursuing the investigation?

[Richard Smith]

[Bill Chapman]

Attention craving Chappers should learn to control his jealousy.

Dritte Reich fanboy sollte ein paar Manieren bekommen

[John Iacoletti]

That's odd logic.  There was no legal obligation by the federal government to conduct ANY investigation into the assassination. The fact that they conducted an extensive investigation when none was legally required suggests that rather than attempting to cover up anything that they were seeking to shed light on the event.

Wow, the delusion is strong in this one.

“We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort”.

[John Iacoletti]

“Richard Smith” is “ganged up on” because he shamelessly lies about the evidence.