I guess he’s talking about the declassified transcript of Adams’ testimony? Not sure why he won’t just answer the question.
But Mr Nessan gives 100% credence to that document and has declared it beyond the bounds of possibility that the word "there" could have been handwritten in by anyone other than Ms Adams.
His strange refusal to specify which document he was 'accusing' of being "completely fabricated" suggests that he's now embarrassed at the fact that he was referring to----------------
actually referring to!--------------my illustrative addition of blue text:

It could have been worse---------he could have accused the green on this document of being fake!
