Messrs Shelley & Lovelady: The Big Lie

[Jack Nessan]

Are you arguing that the Stroud document is "completely fabricated"? Yes or no, Mr Nessan?

No, the Stroud document is real, pathetic, but real. The math doesn't work making the document a joke. Barry Ernest apparently is very proud of having discovered it, but because he has dubious reasoning skills, he does not realize it is nonsense.

Discussing the Stroud document is where your hero, Barry Ernest, hangs you out dry on Adam's WC testimony. Changing "It" to "there" would be her change. The rest of your post on Adams "top secret" WC changes is made up tripe.

Barry Ernest: 2011 

"The letter has since become known as "the Stroud document.
Its contents concerned the testimony of Victoria Adams and how,
on examination, Miss Adams had noticed several spelling and
grammatical errors that she felt needed correction.  None of those
corrections were made in the final version, however."

[Alan Ford]

No, the Stroud document is real, pathetic, but real.

OK, we'll get to the Stroud document anon, but help me out here. Which document exactly were you referring to in Reply #78 (June 19) when you wrote------------------

"The document you are placing so much importance on looks to be completely fabricated"

-------------------?

 

[Jack Nessan]

OK, we'll get to the Stroud document anon, but help me out here. Which document exactly were you referring to in Reply #78 (June 19) when you wrote------------------

"The document you are placing so much importance on looks to be completely fabricated"

-------------------?

 

Post 78 seems obvious.

Unable to support what you have been posting?

[Alan Ford]

Post 78 seems obvious.

Unable to support what you have been posting?

~Grin~

In Reply #78 you wrote:

"The document you are placing so much importance on looks to be completely fabricated"

I have been placing great importance on an array of documents in this thread, so I have to ask you again:

Which document, if not the Stroud letter, are you arguing has been "completely fabricated"?

 

[Alan Ford]

Well!

Ms Dorothy Garner's sighting of Mr Truly and the policeman coming up AFTER Ms Adams ran downstairs leaves Warren Gullibles (and CT Lunchroom Gullibles) only one explanation:

Mr Truly & Officer Baker didn't notice-----------and were not noticed by-----------Ms Adams & Ms Styles because the two men were over by the lunchroom with Mr Oswald when Ms Adams and Ms Styles crossed the second-floor landing.

Challenge to any Warren Gullible clinging on to the above (ear-plugs-dependent) scenario!:

Reconcile
a) Messrs Shelley & Lovelady's account to the WC of their post-assassination movements
with
b) Messrs Shelley & Lovelady's being on the first floor when Ms Adams & Ms Styles arrived on to it

 

[Jack Nessan]

~Grin~

In Reply #78 you wrote:

"The document you are placing so much importance on looks to be completely fabricated"

I have been placing great importance on an array of documents in this thread, so I have to ask you again:

Which document, if not the Stroud letter, are you arguing has been "completely fabricated"?

 

Even the dumbest of people can easily figure out post #78. It looks like the goal is to avoid explaining why you have decided to invent your own evidence. What this really is, is welcome to Alan Ford's fictional fantasy assassination. Courtesy of years being a star on the Deep Politics Forum.

[Alan Ford]

Even the dumbest of people can easily figure out post #78. It looks like the goal is to avoid explaining why you have decided to invent your own evidence.

~Grin~

Which document, if not the Stroud letter, are you arguing has been "completely fabricated"?

[Jack Nessan]

~Grin~

Which document, if not the Stroud letter, are you arguing has been "completely fabricated"?

Smiling a lot can be interpreted as a sign of a simple mind.