Letters from Russia

[Steve M. Galbraith]

False dichotomy.

"investigations" -- ROFL

Ever considered a name change to M. Gullible?

So even Garrison covered up for Ruth Paine? He found nothing.

Multiple investigations conducted by Democrats and Republicans over several generations, news media investigations over decades, investigative reporters, historians.....

All of this is part of the continuing coverup. Right, someone is gullible here.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

LOL

So what is she waiting for?

And what are you waiting for?

As I said, she's gone under oath. Questioned by your conspiracy hero Garrison. He found nothing. She's got nothing to prove. Neither did all of these investigations.

You folks are making the claims not her.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

They also conduced presidents like Nixon, Trump and Biden.

The perpetrators had an equal amount of decades to destroy evidence.

Thanks to LBJ/WC we're stuck with a cold case.

The same perpetrators had "decades" to destroy evidence? But you've figured it out? It's a cold case? I thought you folks solved it?

The news media - at that time and since then - investigated the assassination. The Washington Post, the NY Times, CBS. The same organizations that uncovered Watergate and the CIA and FBI abuses.

But they covered up the murder of JFK? Or the evidence was destroyed?

The perfect conspiracy. The evidence of one is that there's no evidence.

[Charles Collins]

[Steve M. Galbraith]

I suggest you get your sh!t together before continuing.

The request came from you, Einstein:

Let's get some of these conspiracy advocates who make these accusations about all sorts of people do so under oath.

Here's a problem for you: I'm not Ruth Paine. I can't require that any of the conspiracists who defame her testify and go under oath with their claims. I've got no standing. It's her call.

I suggested that she should do so; but I can't make her.

Again, she's gone under oath. Multiple times. Including under Garrison's grand jury, a situation where he could ask her about her role in the Lincoln assassination or the Lindbergh baby kidnapping or anything that came into his paranoid head. He found nothing. She's not afraid to go under oath. There's nothing there in the conspiracy claims against her but fantasies and falsehoods. And here you are.

[Martin Weidmann]

The same perpetrators had "decades" to destroy evidence? But you've figured it out? It's a cold case? I thought you folks solved it?

The news media - at that time and since then - investigated the assassination. The Washington Post, the NY Times, CBS. The same organizations that uncovered Watergate and the CIA and FBI abuses.

But they covered up the murder of JFK? Or the evidence was destroyed?

The perfect conspiracy. The evidence of one is that there's no evidence.

But you've figured it out? It's a cold case? I thought you folks solved it?

Have you figured it out? Or do you simply believe everything you are told?

[John Iacoletti]

When Max Good asked Ruth about the CIA, she got all shifty-eyed and defensive.

[John Iacoletti]

This is where they say June was/is CIA too.

One side says: Lee Oswald, based on evidence by multiple investigations over decades, killed JFK and Tippit.

The other side says: Oswald was innocent. He was framed. Ruth Paine and Michael Paine conspired to kill JFK. And Markham and Brennan and Calloway and Roberts and on and on....a cast of dozens if not more all lied/conspired in the framing of Oswald. Based on no investigation whatsoever.

Which side wants to seize the high ground here?

High horse is more like it.

Hypocrite. You’re perfectly happy to smear Oswald with the thinnest of justification. I would think that Ruth knows it’s not slander if it’s true.