Umbrella Man: Suspicious

[Jerry Freeman]

Ambush, as in 'surprise attack' is the word I introduced ... actions regarding Kennedy and Tippit...Stay tuned for further
word-nourishment.

Mr Chapman usurps all and claims the original formulation of the word ambush re Nov 22 
Actually...Officer Tippit was not ambushed per se. No one was hiding behind a tree or bush.
The policeman [according to Ms Markham] was in full view of his assailant.
Further...according to her testimony....Officer Tippit probably knew his attacker.
We can most likely get more word nourishment from a pencil eraser.

[Richard Smith]

Mr Chapman usurps all and claims the original formulation of the word ambush re Nov 22 
Actually...Officer Tippit was not ambushed per se. No one was hiding behind a tree or bush.
The policeman [according to Ms Markham] was in full view of his assailant.
Further...according to her testimony....Officer Tippit probably knew his attacker.
We can most likely get more word nourishment from a pencil eraser.

The irony of this line of logic.  It also means that Oswald was not hiding when he murdered Tippit.  He did it in plain sight in the presence of numerous witnesses who confirmed that he was the person who pulled the trigger.

[John Iacoletti]

The usual “Richard Smith” 

There weren’t “numerous witnesses” who saw anybody pull a trigger.

[Walt Cakebread]

The usual “Richard Smith” 

There weren’t “numerous witnesses” who saw anybody pull a trigger.

Mr "Smith" never lets the facts stand in his way....

[Jerry Freeman]

Back to the Umbrella Man...First to last visible frame of the umbrella by the road sign.
Appears to rise straight up unhindered.....

[Richard Smith]

Mr "Smith" never lets the facts stand in his way....

Witness hears a BANG from a gunshot - witness looks toward the sound of the gunshot and sees LHO standing there with a gun in his hand.  No other person with a gun is visible in the vicinity of the shooting.  What logical inference can be drawn for this situation here on planet Earth?  And, of course, a witness did literally see him pull the trigger.   It's a slam dunk of guilt.  If there were any doubt, Oswald is arrested a short distance away after resisting arrest.  He has a gun and the same two brand of ammo in his possession as were used to kill Tippit.  What are the odds?  LHO looks exactly like the killer.  He is in both the building from which JFK is assassinated and street that Tippit is murdered.  He has the same ammo as the Tippit killer.  He is acting so suspiciously that he draws the attention of a random citizen.  But he there is doubt according to our contrarians because multiple witnesses didn't see him "pull the trigger."  They just saw him at the murder scene with his gun drawn.  LOL.  That comes as great news for John Wilkes Booth.

[Walt Cakebread]

Witness hears a BANG from a gunshot - witness looks toward the sound of the gunshot and sees LHO standing there with a gun in his hand.  No other person with a gun is visible in the vicinity of the shooting.  What logical inference can be drawn for this situation here on planet Earth?  And, of course, a witness did literally see him pull the trigger.   It's a slam dunk of guilt.  If there were any doubt, Oswald is arrested a short distance away after resisting arrest.  He has a gun and the same two brand of ammo in his possession as were used to kill Tippit.  What are the odds?  LHO looks exactly like the killer.  He is in both the building from which JFK is assassinated and street that Tippit is murdered.  He has the same ammo as the Tippit killer.  He is acting so suspiciously that he draws the attention of a random citizen.  But he there is doubt according to our contrarians because multiple witnesses didn't see him "pull the trigger."  They just saw him at the murder scene with his gun drawn.  LOL.  That comes as great news for John Wilkes Booth.

It's easy to see and understand why you believe what you do..... You never let little things like facts hinder your beliefs .....

It is a FACT that the witnesses at the scene said that they saw the killer removing the spent shells from his revolver as he walked away from the scene.   ALL of those witnesses swore that he removed ONE SHELL AT A TIME as he walked away.   And in FACT the shells were found widely disbursed.

The FACT that the man extracted one shell at a time indicates that the man was NOT using a Smith & Wesson revolver.   The shells are removed all at the same time from a  S&W revolver.....

I wouldn't expect you to understand  this simple fact , Mr "Smith" ..... Because you are blinded by your ego, and you can't see the light because of where you have your head.

[Dan O'meara]

Witness hears a BANG from a gunshot - witness looks toward the sound of the gunshot and sees LHO standing there with a gun in his hand.  No other person with a gun is visible in the vicinity of the shooting.  What logical inference can be drawn for this situation here on planet Earth?  And, of course, a witness did literally see him pull the trigger.   It's a slam dunk of guilt.  If there were any doubt, Oswald is arrested a short distance away after resisting arrest.  He has a gun and the same two brand of ammo in his possession as were used to kill Tippit.  What are the odds?  LHO looks exactly like the killer.  He is in both the building from which JFK is assassinated and street that Tippit is murdered.  He has the same ammo as the Tippit killer.  He is acting so suspiciously that he draws the attention of a random citizen.  But he there is doubt according to our contrarians because multiple witnesses didn't see him "pull the trigger."  They just saw him at the murder scene with his gun drawn.  LOL.  That comes as great news for John Wilkes Booth.

"And, of course, a witness did literally see him pull the trigger.   It's a slam dunk of guilt."

This is it!
This is the moment six decades of doubt and uncertainty come to an end.

Who was the witness Mr Smith?
Who literally saw Oswald pull the trigger?

I can't wait for this whole issue to be put to bed.