A Rock Solid Alibi.....

[John Iacoletti]

Your (Richard) assumptions are not evidence

Show us where the Patton gang assumed anything

Show us what crime this “Patton gang” witnessed.

[Bill Chapman]

Show us what crime this “Patton gang” witnessed.

You seem to be the one doing the assuming. Where did I say that what they saw was a crime? What they saw was a man walking along Patton carrying a handgun. Why, he even slowed down to exchange pleasantries with one of the locals.

Nothin' wrong with that

No you might want focus on what Markham saw if you want to get to the fun part

[Richard Smith]

You engage in all manner baseless and unsupported speculation about Oswald's movements in the minutes leading up to the assassination

Coming from you, this is hilarious. The one actually speculating is you. You claim he was on the 6th floor but haven't got a shred of evidence for that claim.

There is not a "shred" of evidence he was on the 6th floor?  LOL.  Round and round we go down the rabbit hole.  Let's see.  Just his rifle, fired bullet casings from that rifle, his prints on the SN boxes by that window. a long bag with his prints next to the 6th floor window from which the shots were fired.  Oswald apparently couldn't get to the SN and remain unseen and escape the floor without having "superpowers" while some other person could.  Laughable. Weak defense attorney nonsense to defend a guilty client.

Impasse -   a situation in which no progress is possible.

[Walt Cakebread]

There is not a "shred" of evidence he was on the 6th floor?  LOL.  Round and round we go down the rabbit hole.  Let's see.  Just his rifle, fired bullet casings from that rifle, his prints on the SN boxes by that window. a long bag with his prints next to the 6th floor window from which the shots were fired.  Oswald apparently couldn't get to the SN and remain unseen and escape the floor without having "superpowers" while some other person could.  Laughable. Weak defense attorney nonsense to defend a guilty client.

Impasse -   a situation in which no progress is possible.

IF the rifle was his....  How does that prove that Lee was there at 12:30 that day?

Fired bullet casings from the rifle....How do they prove that Lee was there at 12:30 that day ? Those spent shells could have been fired days or weeks before 11/22/63.  And who knows who fired them.

His prints on boxes?....  REALLY Mr "Smith".  How utterly STUPID of you to try to use those prints as proof of anything other than proof that Lee Oswald worked at the TSBD and he handled boxes.

And a paper bag that has no chain of evidence .....  ROTFLMAO!   

[Richard Smith]

IF the rifle was his....  How does that prove that Lee was there at 12:30 that day?

If I ever commit a crime, please let Walt be on the jury!  A crime was committed on Nov. 22 at 12:30 with a rifle.  Witnesses saw a rifle pointed out the 6th floor window of the TSBD at 12:30.  A rifle was found on that floor.  That rifle belonged to Oswald per the Klein's documentation confirming that a rifle with a specific serial number was sent to Oswald's PO Box.  Only Oswald's print were found on that rifle.  Oswald's prints also are found on the very boxes next to that window. Fired bullet casings from that rifle were found by the window from which the shots were fired.  Oswald flees the scene.   Denies owning any rifle.  Can't explain the presence of his rifle at the crime scene.  Murders a police officer less than an hour later.  Has no credible alibi for the moment of the assassination.  Conclusion guilty. 

[Bill Chapman]

Pretty sure a headless chicken makes more sense than you.

Pretty sure the talking chicken ain't headless

[Martin Weidmann]

There is not a "shred" of evidence he was on the 6th floor?  LOL.  Round and round we go down the rabbit hole.  Let's see.  Just his rifle, fired bullet casings from that rifle, his prints on the SN boxes by that window. a long bag with his prints next to the 6th floor window from which the shots were fired.  Oswald apparently couldn't get to the SN and remain unseen and escape the floor without having "superpowers" while some other person could.  Laughable. Weak defense attorney nonsense to defend a guilty client.

Impasse -   a situation in which no progress is possible.

There is not a "shred" of evidence he was on the 6th floor?  LOL.

You can laugh all you want, but you are actually laughing at your own stupidity.

Let's see.  Just his rifle, fired bullet casings from that rifle, his prints on the SN boxes by that window. a long bag with his prints next to the 6th floor window from which the shots were fired.

Just his rifle,

Lol. Even if it was his rifle, how does that prove he was on the 6th floor at 12:30 on 11/22? Answer: it doesn't

fired bullet casings from that rifle

Lol. When were the bullets belonging to those casings fired? And how does that prove he was on the 6th floor at 12:30 on 11/22? Answer: it doesn't

his prints on the SN boxes by that window

Lol. He worked in the building and part of his job was to move boxes. And how does that prove he was on the 6th floor at 12:30 on 11/22? Answer: it doesn't

a long bag with his prints next to the 6th floor window from which the shots were fired.

What bag? The one that can not be seen in any in situ photographs?  And how does that prove he was on the 6th floor at 12:30 on 11/22? Answer: it doesn't

See the pattern?

Oswald apparently couldn't get to the SN and remain unseen and escape the floor without having "superpowers" while some other person could.

Only if you assume that shots were actually fired from the 6th floor window. We only have Brennan's word for that and he lied about just about everything from his location to the identification, on second thought, of Oswald. Not the most reliable witness.

All you really have is a theory based on all sorts of assumptions. The fact that those assumptions are highly questionable and are partly a physical impossibility, except of course in a fairytale, doesn't make any difference for you. It's one thing to believe that Oswald was the lone nut gun man but to do so without actual conclusive evidence is absolutely pathetic. As I said before, you haven't got a shred of evidence that Oswald was actually on the 6th floor of the TSBD at 12:30 on 11/22/63.

[Bill Chapman]

Says the self-appointed prophet and decider.

No 'Prophet-eering' necessary when this image shows giraffe-necked persons
are not needed to peer 'overboard' so-to-speak.


billchapman