There are no questionable "assumptions" here. Even if you repeat that contrarian nonsense a million times. Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor, fired bullet casings from his rifle were found by the window, witnesses did see a rifle pointed from that window at the moment of the assassination (i.e. 12:30). Oswald was in the building at the moment the shots were fired and had no credible alibi, Oswald's prints were found on the SN boxes (no other employee left their prints on those particular boxes), a long bag with Oswald's prints was found next to the SN, Oswald lied about his ownership of any rifle (as confirmed by his own wife, BY photos, and Klein's document), Oswald fled the scene within minutes, he obtained a gun, and murdered a police officer less than an hour. Those are facts and evidence.
There are only two choices here: 1) you accept the evidence in which case Oswald is stone cold guilty; or 2) you believe all this evidence derived from a variety of different sources including state and federal law enforcement agencies, third party businesses, and random citizens was fabricated to frame Oswald as part of a conspiracy. What are assumptions and even baseless speculation is making bizarre claims like Oswald needed "superpowers" to sit behind some boxes and not be heard and get off the 6th floor unseen after the assassination. Something that we know someone must have been able to do since we know someone was on the 6th floor pointing a rifle out the window at 12:30 per the witness confirmations. For some reason, you constantly suggest Oswald couldn't do the same things that your fantasy conspirators could do.
There are no questionable "assumptions" here. Even if you repeat that contrarian nonsense a million times. There are a multitude of questionable "assumptions" here. Even if you repeat that "there aren't" nonsense a million times.
Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor "Oswald's rifle" LOL
Those are facts and evidence. You clearly don't understand the difference between opinions, assumptions and actual facts.
There are only two choices here: No. You want there to be only two choices to somehow make your strawman crap work. There are more choices whether you like it or not
What are assumptions and even baseless speculation is making bizarre claims like Oswald needed "superpowers" to sit behind some boxes and not be heard and get off the 6th floor unseen after the assassination. And yet, you still haven't been able to explain how he managed to get into the sniper's nest without Bonnie Ray Williams saw or heard him, how he could run to the back of the building without the guys on the 5th floor hearing a single footstep and how he could pass by Adams, Styles (on the stairs) and Garner without anybody seeing or hearing him. Surely if what I say is "baseless speculation" you should be able to answer those questions..... So, why don't you?
Something that we know someone must have been able to do since we know someone was on the 6th floor pointing a rifle out the window at 12:30 per the witness confirmations. What witness confirmations? And btw, witnesses are always 100% correct, right? But wait, that means that Rowland must also have been right when he said he saw a man with a rifle at a window at the other side of the building..... Go figure.
Something that we know someone must have been able to doSomebody may well have been able to do something, but we are talking about Oswald and he has to be in the 2nd floor lunchroom some 75 seconds after the last shot. No other "somebody" had to meet that requirement.
For some reason, you constantly suggest Oswald couldn't do the same things that your fantasy conspirators could do. The fact that you still don't understand what I am saying, tells me a lot about your limitations in processing basic information.
