I know that’s what he said. But it doesn’t jibe with the other evidence.
Is this other evidence what you posted a few posts back in this thread?
Arnold Rowland only mentions seeing one white man on the sixth floor in his same day affidavit. Why would he omit seeing another person
if he actually did?
And who said they saw the lunch remains in the sniper’s nest? Was any person who said that an actual experienced crime scene investigator investigating this scene (or just a motor jockey or traffic cop, etc.). There were photographs taken, and even a TV news camera on the sixth floor at that time. Yet there are no images of these supposed lunch remains in the sniper’s nest!
Some “evidence” that you have there!