Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago  (Read 25240 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #72 on: August 26, 2022, 04:33:36 PM »
Advertisement
After the DOJ had the FBI carry out a search and seizure warrant at Donald Trump’s home, he spent two weeks focusing on trying to force the release of the search warrant affidavit. It was a blatant attempt on his part at finding out who within his orbit has been secretly cooperating with the Feds against him. That effort predictably failed.

But as is often the case in these types of situations, multiple major media outlets also requested a redacted version of the affidavit, so they could report on it. Generally speaking, the media will always gladly take any information it can get in these situations, without regard for whether it helps or hurts either side. So if this judge had decided to give the media an overly revealing version of the affidavit, this would be a de facto win for Donald Trump, even though he wasn’t the one making this specific request.

This week the judge asked the DOJ to submit a version of the affidavit that it felt was sufficiently redacted so as to protect its ongoing investigation into Trump. Today the judge approved the DOJ’s redactions. This means that when the redacted affidavit is released tomorrow, it’ll include only the precise information that the DOJ is willing to put out there about the case, and nothing that the DOJ is still looking to keep secret.

This would have been a win for Donald Trump if the judge had rejected the DOJ’s proposed redactions and instead ordered the release of a more revealing version of the affidavit. But this ruling is a loss for Trump. The media’s effort to unseal the affidavit was Trump’s last best chance at finding out anything about the DOJ’s case against him that the DOJ doesn’t want him to know – and that affidavit just went down the drain.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #72 on: August 26, 2022, 04:33:36 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #73 on: August 26, 2022, 09:29:53 PM »
Lock Him Up!

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #74 on: August 27, 2022, 12:32:50 AM »
In hindsight, taking the biggest criminal in history and making him President of the United States wasn’t the best idea.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #74 on: August 27, 2022, 12:32:50 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #75 on: August 27, 2022, 12:44:53 AM »
Trump’s “We gave them much” defense isn’t the clever trick he thinks it is. He’s confessing that he knew he had the documents, he knew the federal government had demanded them back, and that he only returned some of them. DOJ will use his “we gave them much” post at his trial. 

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #76 on: August 27, 2022, 06:24:37 AM »
Mark August 26, 2022 down in history

Affidavit says this about a former President's residence:

"Probable cause exists to believe that evidence, contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed in violation will be found at the premises".


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #76 on: August 27, 2022, 06:24:37 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #77 on: August 27, 2022, 06:53:37 AM »
Trump will be indicted': Mar-a-Lago affidavit spells trouble for the former president and decimates his main defense



A federal magistrate judge on Friday unsealed a redacted version of an FBI affidavit that legal experts said is a damning blow to former President Donald Trump as he's investigated over his handling of sensitive records.

Significant portions of the document were blacked out to conceal information about witnesses, sources and methods, grand jury details, and the overall size and scope of the department's inquiry.

Still, the affidavit contained telling clues about why investigators took the extraordinary step of executing a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate earlier this month. It also revealed the extent to which officials tried using less intrusive measures to get Trump to hand over government records that were improperly stored at his Florida residence.

"There certainly existed probable cause to believe that the former president retained classified documents in violation of the applicable statute in a place that was not secure according to the regulations," David Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of Florida, told Insider.

"This hurts him more than this helps him," he added.

Norm Eisen, the ethics czar under former President Barack Obama, wrote after going through the affidavit that "even redacted it is absolutely damning."

"People are likely going to jail for this conduct," he said.

Some national security veterans went a step further, directly calling out the 45th president and suggesting there may be a first-ever criminal case against a former chief executive.

"I have seen enough, folks," Bradley Moss, a prominent Washington, DC, national security lawyer, wrote on Twitter. "Donald Trump will be indicted in the classified documents matter. I'm placing my marker."

Here are some key details from the affidavit:

- A National Archives review of 15 boxes of government records that Trump turned over in January found that they contained "newspapers, magazines, printed news articles, photos, miscellaneous print-outs, notes, presidential correspondence, personal and post-presidential records, and 'a lot of classified records.'"

- The "most significant concern" for NARA was that "highly classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified."

- There were 184 documents with classification markings in the boxes: 25 were marked top-secret, 92 were marked secret, and 67 were marked confidential.

- Several of the documents contained what appears to be [Trump's] handwritten notes," the affidavit said.

Perhaps just as noteworthy, the Justice Department revealed in a brief accompanying the affidavit that it is keeping portions of the records related to the Mar-a-Lago search sealed to protect a "significant number of civilian witnesses."


Barbara McQuade, the former US attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, told Insider that language suggests "people inside Trump's former administration or at Mar-a-Lago are providing information to the FBI."

The brief also said the government has probable cause to believe "that a statute prohibiting obstruction of justice has been violated," and that there is a heightened risk of violence against FBI agents and other law enforcement personnel in the wake of the Mar-a-Lago search.

A footnote undermines Trump's main defense

Alan Dershowitz, the conservative lawyer who represented Trump in his Senate impeachment trial, told Insider that "there's no doubt" the FBI had probable cause to search Mar-a-Lago.

He added that "there may be enough there for an indictment," but he doesn't think Trump will ultimately be charged because in the past, "people who have done similar things have not been indicted."

Dershowitz also predicted that Trump's legal team will try to argue that he had declassified all the documents stored at Mar-a-Lago, but that such a defense "will have to be based in fact."

Indeed, details contained in the redacted affidavit about the classification markings fly in the face of Trump's claim that he had declassified everything. CNN also spoke to 18 former White House aides and advisors this month, none of whom had heard of any standing declassification order.

And McQuade, the former US attorney, pointed out that the affidavit said some of the classified materials Trump had in his possession were marked ORCON, or "originator controlled," meaning they cannot be declassified without the permission of the agency they came from.

More importantly, though, even if Trump had declassified the materials in his possession, it likely wouldn't matter — and the FBI's affidavit said as much.

Specifically, it pointed out that Section E of the Espionage Act, one of the three laws Trump is suspected of having violated, makes it a crime to retain any government records pertaining to the US's national defense, regardless of classification level:



A footnote from the FBI's affidavit points out that information does not have to be classified to be covered under the Espionage Act. Department of Justice

The other two federal statutes Trump's suspected of having broken — 18 USC Section 2071 and 18 USC Section 1519 — criminalize the concealment, removal, and destruction of government records, also regardless of classification level.

Shanlon Wu, a longtime former federal prosecutor, told Insider that Trump's lawyers are "barking up the wrong tree by focusing only on classification."

He noted that in addition to the fact that the laws Trump is suspected of violating don't depend on classification, the redacted portions of the affidavit could detail why federal officials didn't believe they could trust Trump's lawyers when they said that all classified material had been turned back over to the government.

Overall, the FBI recovered more than two dozen boxes of official government records between January and this month, when they searched Mar-a-Lago.

Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ruled to release the affidavit on Thursday, a decision that was in and of itself significant.

Typically, affidavits aren't released until formal charges are filed in an investigation. But former prosecutors say the unusual circumstances of this case, coupled with intense public interest in the matter, likely weighed in favor of the document's release for Reinhart.

"This is huge," said one former DOJ official, who requested anonymity to candidly discuss the case. "But there's so much distrust in the Justice Department and the FBI, and if you keep a document like this hidden, the conspiracy theories just breed themselves."

"Let it out and show it the light of day," they added. "Of course it has to be redacted, but people need to see that [US officials] tried multiple times to get these highly classified documents, that Trump wouldn't give them up, and they were just sitting in a basement in Florida."

Trump, for his part, had repeatedly and publicly called for the release of the FBI's affidavit.

He put out a statement after it was released on Friday, accusing the FBI and DOJ of a "public relations subterfuge" and recycling claims of political persecution and bias.

https://www.businessinsider.com/mar-a-lago-fbi-affidavit-signals-trump-could-get-indicted-2022-8



Explosive report claims a phony Rothschild heiress infiltrated Mar-a-Lago and Trump’s inner circle



An explosive new report from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette claims that the FBI is investigating a Russian-speaking Ukrainian immigrant named Inna Yashchyshyn who allegedly gained repeated access to former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort under a fake identity.

According to the Post-Gazette's sources, Yashchyshyn got access to Mar-a-Lago by posing as a member of the famous Rothschild banking family, and she worked to look the part by "donning designer clothes, a Rolex watch, and driving a $170,000 black Mercedes-Benz SUV."

Yashchyshyn's case first came to the attention of federal authorities when she got into a legal dispute with a former associate that led to a court battle that exposed her frequent trips to Mar-a-Lago.

Yashchyshyn, who speaks multiple languages, had previously worked for an adoption agency that specialized in helping pregnant Russian women get American citizenship for their babies by having them come to the United States.

The partner testified in a court affidavit that Yashchyshyn used "her fake identity as Anna de Rothschild to gain access to and build relationships with U.S. politicians, including but not limited to Donald Trump, Lindsey Graham, and Eric Greitens."

In fact, there is even a photo of Yashchyshyn at Mar-a-Lago standing on the golf course with both Trump and Graham.

In an interview with the Post-Gazette, Yashchyshyn denies that she ever entered Mar-a-Lago using a phony alias and she said her partner claimed that in order to harm her personally.

Nonetheless, the FBI is still investigating her as a potential foreign intelligence threat.

Charles Marino, a former Secret Service supervisor, tells the paper that "the question is was it a fraud or an intelligence threat,” and then added that "the fact that we are asking this question is a problem."

Read the full report at this link:

https://newsinteractive.post-gazette.com/anna-de-rothschild-trump-mar-a-lago-security-fbi-investigation/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #78 on: August 28, 2022, 07:00:02 AM »
U.S. intelligence officials will assess the materials taken from Mar-a-Lago

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will review materials taken from former President Donald Trump's home in Florida for potential national security risks.

A spokesperson for ODNI told NPR that intelligence leaders will assess what level of harm could come from releasing documents seized from Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort.

"ODNI will closely coordinate with [the Justice Department] to ensure this [Intelligence Community] assessment is conducted in a manner that does not unduly interfere with DOJ's ongoing criminal investigation," the spokesperson said.

Meanwhile, a federal judge said she is inclined to grant Trump's request to appoint a special master to oversee the search of the seized material.

The decision is not final, and U.S. District Judge Aileen Gannon also told the Justice Department to produce "a more detailed" list of the items that were taken from Mar-a-Lago.

This is an initial step in a legal process that will span weeks.

Lawmakers back the intelligence community's move

Rep. Adam Schiff, who chairs the House intelligence committee, and Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, who chairs the House oversight and reform committee, praised the intelligence community for their assessment in a joint statement.

"The DOJ affidavit, partially unsealed yesterday, affirms our grave concern that among the documents stored at Mar-a-Lago were those that could endanger human sources," they said. "It is critical that the [Intelligence Community] move swiftly to assess and, if necessary, to mitigate the damage done—a process that should proceed in parallel with DOJ's criminal investigation."

A redacted version of the affidavit used by the FBI to search the former president's home was made available Friday, nearly half of which was unreadable, NPR has reported.

According to the affidavit, 184 classified documents were found among 15 boxes taken from the resort earlier this year. Twenty-five of the documents were labeled "Top Secret."

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/27/1119827517/trump-mar-a-lago-documents-seized-odni-intelligence-assessment

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #79 on: August 28, 2022, 09:21:23 PM »
Criminal Donald is now threatening to incite violence in retaliation for the DOJ investigating him. Threats like that are evidence of consciousness of guilt. All it does is motivate the DOJ to arrest him sooner, and it increases the odds of his conviction at trial.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: FBI raids Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
« Reply #79 on: August 28, 2022, 09:21:23 PM »