I've already explained this multiple times. It is impossible to reconstruct the movements of Oswald and your witnesses to the level of precision that you insist is accurate. It simply can't be done. Even if you repeat it over and over and insist it is a fact. Human beings do not recall their movements down to the second with that kind of precision. You have grafted on to their testimony a narrative that suits your desired narrative (i.e. that Oswald is innocent) based upon unknowable information. Any small variation allows Oswald to reach the lunchroom unnoticed. Which he did as we know happened from the evidence left behind.
Now answer my question. How can you not be a CTer if you think it is a fact, based upon the testimony you cite, that Oswald could not have come down the stairs from the 6th floor to the lunchroom? What alternative option does that leave for him to reach the lunchroom if he didn't use the stairs or elevator? The implication is clear if your facts are true as you have insisted. He couldn't have reached the lunchroom and, thus, could not have been the assassin. So explain to us how you are not a CTer if you think it is a proven fact that Oswald couldn't reach the lunchroom from the 6th floor.
So, you can't explain how Oswald could have gone down the stairs unnoticed nor can you show the evidence you now claim there is for him managing to do so. Got it!
As to this CT crap you keep on spouting. It's a waste of time. Nobody cares and I certainly don't care if you think I am a CT or not. It's just something you want to use to deflect the conversation away from the simple fact that you haven't got a shred of evidence for any of many questionable claims you have made and are still making.
You want us to believe that Oswald came down the stairs unnoticed, but when asked to explain how he could have done that, you become vague and hide, as the coward you are, behind unreliable human recollections. The bottom line is simple; you simply can not explain how Oswald could have managed to get down the stairs without being noticed and your claim there is evidence that proves it is simply a lie.
All you have is a rifle (which you think belongs to Oswald) and three shells. Everything else is a product of your imagination. You can not produce proof for Oswald being on the 6th floor at 12:30, for him firing the shots and for him coming down the stairs unnoticed, simply because it doesn't exist. One doesn't have to be a CT to understand this. Just having a functional brain and a sense for realism will do.
