Poll claims Oswald seen as ......

[Martin Weidmann]

Run, Martin, run.  More deflecting to other issues.  You concluded, based on your analysis of the evidence, that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."    If he "didn't come down the stairs," then he couldn't have been on the 6th floor as the stairs were the ONLY way for him to have reached the 2nd floor lunchroom in time for the Baker encounter.  Thus, the only implication that can be drawn from YOUR conclusion, is that Oswald is not the assassin.  Why can't you just acknowledge that is your position?  Why struggle so mightily against your own conclusion?  I can't understand why you just don't say that you believe Oswald is innocent and that you are a CTer.   It's very humorous.

Thank you for confirming by lack of response that you do indeed not have any credible evidence to support your claims about Oswald;

- bringing the rifle to the TSBD and hiding it there
- being on the 6th floor at 12:30, when the shots were fired
- actually shooting at Kennedy
- going down the stairs to the 2nd floor unnoticed, within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot.

That's settled then.... 

Btw, I hope that one day you will get your obsession with me under control and find a way to get out of the continuous loop of nonsense you are stuck in.

[John Iacoletti]

I've quoted (literally) Martin's exact words but I'm somehow putting words in his mouth.  The contrarian mind is astounding.  Here it is again (notice the quotes):

Which you then misrepresented as “Oswald could not have come down the stairs”.

But the words you’re desperately trying to put in Martin’s mouth is “I believe Oswald is innocent”, and that’s to deflect from your own inability to prove that he’s guilty. It’s transparent as hell.

[John Iacoletti]

Thank you for confirming by lack of response that you do indeed not have any credible evidence to support your claims about Oswald;

- bringing the rifle to the TSBD and hiding it there
- being on the 6th floor at 12:30, when the shots were fired
- actually shooting at Kennedy
- going down the stairs to the 2nd floor unnoticed, within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot.

That's settled then.... 

C’mon, “Richard”. Stop dancing and deflecting and just answer the question. Or admit that you cannot.

[Martin Weidmann]

Which you then misrepresented as “Oswald could not have come down the stairs”.

But the words you’re desperately trying to put in Martin’s mouth is “I believe Oswald is innocent”, and that’s to deflect from your own inability to prove that he’s guilty. It’s transparent as hell.

But the words you’re desperately trying to put in Martin’s mouth is “I believe Oswald is innocent”,

Which is actually highly ironic coming from a die hard LN, but that aside. Richard's primitive black and white "logic" doesn't allow him to understand that even if the rifle found on the 6th floor is the same one that Oswald ordered from Klein's, that still doesn't even begin to prove that Oswald was on the 6th floor himself when the shots were fired. Along those same lines, Richard also doesn't understand that even if Oswald was not on the 6th floor, did not shoot a Kennedy and did not go down the stairs unnoticed, that doesn't necessarily mean that his is innocent.

It seems these kind of things are just too complicated for Richard to grasp. Kinda sad, really....

[Jerry Organ]

Clearly you believe that a CT is something to be shunned.

Actually it's CTs like Martin, Iacoletti and Freeman who shun the title of CT.

And that's exactly what the government has promoted.  The government wants anybody who rejects the official US government position, that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone nut assassin, to be scorned and mocked.

Seems to have worked on the Three Amigos. They avoid the title of CT like the plague. Wonder why? Aren't they up on Govt. indoctrination? Or maybe they're not as astute as Walt Cakebread.

But at this late date, and with all of the information that has surfaced , that position is no longer tenable ....  And only a damned fool would continue to try to promote it.

LNers don't "promote" anything. We just don't apply an impossible standard or proof to the evidence. We live in the real world. For example, we don't use a fuzzy version of the Powell photo when there's better defined versions of the same photo.

[Martin Weidmann]

Actually it's CTs like Martin, Iacoletti and Freeman who shun the title of CT.

Seems to have worked on the Three Amigos. They avoid the title of CT like the plague. Wonder why? Aren't they up on Govt. indoctrination? Or maybe they're not as astute as Walt Cakebread.

LNers don't "promote" anything. We just don't apply an impossible standard or proof to the evidence. We live in the real world. For example, we don't use a fuzzy version of the Powell photo when there's better defined versions of the same photo.

Actually it's CTs like Martin

Please explain how somebody who has no conspiracy theory and who couldn't care less if there actually was a conspiracy or if Oswald did it alone, can be deemed to be a conspiracy theorist?

LNers don't "promote" anything.

Except for a pathetic official narrative that can not survive the slightest scrutiny......

We just don't apply an impossible standard or proof to the evidence.

This is absolutely true. You (not sure who "we" are) apply no standard at all and take everything at face value.

[John Iacoletti]

Actually it's CTs like Martin, Iacoletti and Freeman who shun the title of CT.

A “CT” is somebody who has a conspiracy theory, not somebody who looks at the evidence and finds it weak, circumstantial, and tainted.

LNers don't "promote" anything.

Bull. You promote the official fantasy narrative like it’s gospel.

[Bill Chapman]

Actually it's CTs like Martin, Iacoletti and Freeman who shun the title of CT.

Seems to have worked on the Three Amigos. They avoid the title of CT like the plague. Wonder why? Aren't they up on Govt. indoctrination? Or maybe they're not as astute as Walt Cakebread.

LNers don't "promote" anything. We just don't apply an impossible standard or proof to the evidence. We live in the real world. For example, we don't use a fuzzy version of the Powell photo when there's better defined versions of the same photo.

LNers don't "promote" anything.
_Then you must have missed my latest PSA announcements
  Plain & simple: Oswald got what he deserved