Hunter Biden laptop

[Richard Smith]

If Hunter still had his laptop, he could do a Google search to see when he is going to jail.

[Richard Smith]

They are preparing a room for Hunter in the big house.  Will the FBI stage a predawn air, sea, and ground assault on his Malibu home to take him into custody like they have done to nonviolent elderly people like Roger Stone?  LOL.

[Richard Smith]

This was once deemed "disinformation" and the product of Russian interference.  Any mention was subject to a ban on social media highlighting the incredible bias and attempts by social media to influence the 2020 election.  Chris Wallace actually shutdown President Trump when he tried to raise this issue during the debate.   Ironically, the leftist media did exactly what they were suggesting the Russians were doing during the election. 

Better later than never, though:  "CBS joins New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, CNN in verifying laptop after media dismissed New York Post's reporting."

[Joe Elliott]

This was once deemed "disinformation" and the product of Russian interference.  Any mention was subject to a ban on social media highlighting the incredible bias and attempts by social media to influence the 2020 election.  Chris Wallace actually shutdown President Trump when he tried to raise this issue during the debate.   Ironically, the leftist media did exactly what they were suggesting the Russians were doing during the election. 

Better later than never, though:  "CBS joins New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, CNN in verifying laptop after media dismissed New York Post's reporting."

How could the media, or anyone, "verify" the laptop.

Did the laptop go directly from Hunter Biden to a reputable agency like the Washington Post or the FBI? No. It went from Hunter Biden, to someone hostile to him, a laptop repairman, before it, or a copy of the data went on to the Washington post.

Did the people hostile to Hunter Biden have access to experts who could fake data very well? Yes, by simply taking the laptop to any Russian embassy and asking them to examine it. Such a notion would be obvious, because Trump, in a 2016 Presidential debate, called upon the Russians to find/manufacture email evidence against Hillary Clinton.

Quote from Wikipedia on the Hunter Biden laptop controversy:

On October 19, 2020, a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials, who had served in the Trump administration and those of the three previous presidents, released an open letter stating that the release of the alleged emails "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," adding:

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement – just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.

This is a classic case of a piece of 'evidence' having major "Chain of Custody" issues. The CTers cite this a lot. But never with an example of a piece of evidence passing through the hands of a non police or FBI official, with a clear motive to fake the evidence. Merely the suggestion that such and such an officer may have been motivated against Oswald. Never a clear case like that of the laptop repairman being hostile to the Biden's.

[Richard Smith]

How could the media, or anyone, "verify" the laptop.

Did the laptop go directly from Hunter Biden to a reputable agency like the Washington Post or the FBI? No. It went from Hunter Biden, to someone hostile to him, a laptop repairman, before it, or a copy of the data went on to the Washington post.

Did the people hostile to Hunter Biden have access to experts who could fake data very well? Yes, by simply taking the laptop to any Russian embassy and asking them to examine it. Such a notion would be obvious, because Trump, in a 2016 Presidential debate, called upon the Russians to find/manufacture email evidence against Hillary Clinton.

Quote from Wikipedia on the Hunter Biden laptop controversy:

On October 19, 2020, a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials, who had served in the Trump administration and those of the three previous presidents, released an open letter stating that the release of the alleged emails "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," adding:

This is a classic case of a piece of 'evidence' having major "Chain of Custody" issues. The CTers cite this a lot. But never with an example of a piece of evidence passing through the hands of a non police or FBI official, with a clear motive to fake the evidence. Merely the suggestion that such and such an officer may have been motivated against Oswald. Never a clear case like that of the laptop repairman being hostile to the Biden's.

They somehow "verified" it was disinformation before the election.   Anyone who suggested otherwise was banned from social media as a conspiracy theorist.  It's a very simple matter to verify it.  The FBI has had it for a couple of years.  You don't think they have that capability?  You don't think Hunter knows?  It's his laptop.  Maybe ask him under oath at the risk of perjury.  You believe the leftist media is framing Biden suddenly?  The "intelligence" officers were all political hacks that had no more information about the laptop than the average person.  It was an attempt to cover up the damage to get Trump out of office at all costs.  It's what the radicals call "collusion" and an "insurrection" to undermine democracy.  You should be outraged regardless of political bias.

[Joe Elliott]

They somehow "verified" it was disinformation before the election.   Anyone who suggested otherwise was banned from social media as a conspiracy theorist.  It's a very simple matter to verify it.  The FBI has had it for a couple of years. You don't think they have that capability?  You don't think Hunter knows?  It's his laptop.  Maybe ask him under oath at the risk of perjury.  You believe the leftist media is framing Biden suddenly?  The "intelligence" officers were all political hacks that had no more information about the laptop than the average person.  It was an attempt to cover up the damage to get Trump out of office at all costs.  It's what the radicals call "collusion" and an "insurrection" to undermine democracy.  You should be outraged regardless of political bias.

The FBI has had the laptop for a couple of years.

Did someone else other than Hunter Biden have the laptop before the FBI? Yes.
Was that person hostile to the Biden's? Yes.
Did that hostile person have access to the sort of expertise to plant convincing evidence against Hunter Biden? Yes.
Who could these experts be? The Russians.

Which of these questions have I given a false answer to?

Whether this laptop ever belong to Hunter Biden is immaterial. It would have to pass directly from Hunter Biden to the FBI to be considered valid evidence. Which it did not.

The people who want to take down the reputation of the Biden's have to have some evidence other than this laptop. And if they do, why do the continue to focus on this laptop which is worthless in proving anything.

[Richard Smith]

The FBI has had the laptop for a couple of years.

Did someone else other than Hunter Biden have the laptop before the FBI? Yes.
Was that person hostile to the Biden's? Yes.
Did that hostile person have access to the sort of expertise to plant convincing evidence against Hunter Biden? Yes.
Who could these experts be? The Russians.

Which of these questions have I given a false answer to?

Whether this laptop ever belong to Hunter Biden is immaterial. It would have to pass directly from Hunter Biden to the FBI to be considered valid evidence. Which it did not.

The people who want to take down the reputation of the Biden's have to have some evidence other than this laptop. And if they do, why do the continue to focus on this laptop which is worthless in proving anything.

Again, even the radical leftist media sources have confirmed that this was Hunter's laptop.  To my knowledge, no one including even Hunter Biden himself denies this was his laptop and that the contents are genuine.  The emails can be checked with the recipients and servers.  This is not rocket science.


"CBS joins New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, CNN in verifying laptop after media dismissed New York Post's reporting."

[Joe Elliott]

Again, even the radical leftist media sources have confirmed that this was Hunter's laptop.  To my knowledge, no one including even Hunter Biden himself denies this was his laptop and that the contents are genuine.  The emails can be checked with the recipients and servers.  This is not rocket science.


"CBS joins New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, CNN in verifying laptop after media dismissed New York Post's reporting."

Yes. It was his laptop. But the points you keep dodging are:

1. Did someone else modify the contents of his laptop?
2. If not, how could we possibly know this?