Hunter Biden laptop

[Joe Elliott]

Hunter needs a new lawyer since his current one just inadvertantely confirmed (not that there was any doubt) that the contents of the laptop are his:

“Backing up Mr. Biden’s files for any repair did not require Mr. Mac Isaac to review the contents of any such files,” a lawyer for Biden wrote. “Mr. Biden did not consent to Mr. Mac Isaac gaining access to the content of those files in April 2019 or at any other time.”

But confirms that Mr. Mac Isaac had access to those files. And could have modified them. Or gotten someone else to modify them, and modify servers to make the files look legit. Someone like the Russians who would have the knowledge and means to do all of that.

It's one thing if the laptop was in continuous position of the FBI or the police. It's another thing if it was in possession of someone hostile to Biden and his father. I don't see how this doesn't destroy the value of this 'evidence'.

[Richard Smith]

But confirms that Mr. Mac Isaac had access to those files. And could have modified them. Or gotten someone else to modify them, and modify servers to make the files look legit. Someone like the Russians who would have the knowledge and means to do all of that.

It's one thing if the laptop was in continuous position of the FBI or the police. It's another thing if it was in possession of someone hostile to Biden and his father. I don't see how this doesn't destroy the value of this 'evidence'.

Using the time-honored JFK CTer tactic that someone "could" have altered the evidence?  It's possible.  There is no evidence, however, of such and presumably the FBI could figure out if a computer guy altered evidence.  He is not exactly Bill Gates.  But keep telling yourself that and ignoring the fact that the crack addicted son of the president was paid millions from several foreign sources including Russia and China.  And the "big guy" got a cut.  If this were Trump, he would be in a cage. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Using the time-honored JFK CTer tactic that someone "could" have altered the evidence?  It's possible.  There is no evidence, however, of such and presumably the FBI could figure out if a computer guy altered evidence.  He is not exactly Bill Gates.  But keep telling yourself that and ignoring the fact that the crack addicted son of the president was paid millions from several foreign sources including Russia and China.  And the "big guy" got a cut.  If this were Trump, he would be in a cage.

Why don't you just wait and see what is actually on the laptop. There has been all sorts of speculation but so far the investigation of the FBI (which has been going for a while now) seems to have yielded very little.

[Richard Smith]

Why don't you just wait and see what is actually on the laptop. There has been all sorts of speculation but so far the investigation of the FBI (which has been going for a while now) seems to have yielded very little.

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.  Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.  But at least we can put to rest the bizarre conspiracy narrative that the Russians were behind this.  Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.  Very amusing logical inconsistency.

[Jon Banks]

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.  Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.  But at least we can put to rest the bizarre conspiracy narrative that the Russians were behind this.  Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.  Very amusing logical inconsistency.

Four years now. They got the laptop in 2019.

Very unlikely that the FBI or Homeland Security wouldn't confirm that Russia was involved with violating the privacy of the President's son.

[Martin Weidmann]

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.  Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.  But at least we can put to rest the bizarre conspiracy narrative that the Russians were behind this.  Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.  Very amusing logical inconsistency.

How many more years should we wait? 

As long as it takes. Or would you prefer they jump to conclusions, as you normally do?

The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.

Who says they haven't done anything? They may well have investigated it and found there simply is no there there. Not that you would ever accept that.

Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.

Have you read the book? I seriously doubt it....

Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.

Who exactly made those claims?

[Richard Smith]

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.

Who says they haven't done anything? They may well have investigated it and found there simply is no there there. Not that you would ever accept that.

Yes, I'm sure that is the case.  And then they kept it to themselves.  LOL.  That contradicts reports from numerous media outlets including leftist propaganda arms such as CNN and CBS:


"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

Evidence gathered by FBI and IRS investigators was sent to the U.S. Attorney's office in Delaware, according to the sources."

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes, I'm sure that is the case.  And then they kept it to themselves.  LOL.  That contradicts reports from numerous media outlets including leftist propaganda arms such as CNN and CBS:

"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

Evidence gathered by FBI and IRS investigators was sent to the U.S. Attorney's office in Delaware, according to the sources."

According to sources?

And then they kept it to themselves.

Do you advocate that the FBI holds a press conference about the outcome of every investigation?

"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun

So, possible tax evasion and a false statement to buy a gun? That's it? No influence peddling, no 10% for the "big guy"? Wow....  Call the media