Whew. The astounding irony here is that you are the one who interjected the suggestion China targeted ONLY the US as a way to discount the threat of a biological agent. You created a strawman asking why China would attack the US using COVID. My response to that question was 100% accurate. No one ever indicated that COVID was targeted only to the US. Again, though, I've now confirmed a dozen times or more that we don't know the origins of COVID and therefore can't discount the possibility that it was developed as a biological agent. Its origin and purpose is UNCLEAR. I'm not sure what is so difficult to understand or what point that you are trying to make since - once again - whether China targeted a biological agent to the world or not has no relevance to the balloon. You argued that this balloon posed no security risk to the US. That is profoundly idiotic. There are examples dating back to WWII and beyond of balloons being used for military purposes including bombs being delivered to the US mainland during WWII resulting in civilian deaths. They can be used for such purposes. That is simply a fact. There is nothing controversial about that conclusion. Why you would take issue with it to such an extent is bizarre. Even from you.
Your reading comprehension problem is getting worse. Nearly as bad as your constant misrepresentations of what was actually said.
you are the one who interjected the suggestion China targeted ONLY the USNo I didn't.
You created a strawman asking why China would attack the US using COVID. No I didn't.
My response to that question was 100% accurate. No one ever indicated that COVID was targeted only to the US.Targeting a country is an act of deliberate aggression. So, when you used the word "targeted" you were clearly saying that you believed that China had released the virus on purpose, regardless of all this "it's unclear" stuff. The use of the word "targeted" exposed your paranoia.
You argued that this balloon posed no security risk to the US. That is profoundly idiotic.It would be idiotic, if it were true. But it isn't. I never argued any such thing.
Why you would take issue with it to such an extent is bizarre.What exactly do I take issue with? Is it possible that a balloon is used to deliver a nuclear or biological weapon? Sure it is, but it's just as unlikely as a using a donkey or a flock of seagulls to deliver the weapon.
The mere fact that your first thoughts about the balloon were that it could deliver a nuclear or biological weapon, despite the fact that the authorities have always called it a possible spy-balloon, clearly demonstrates that you have lost your grip on reality. You than went even further by saying that Covid had killed a million Americans (which is true but has nothing to do with the balloon) and that China had purposely targeted not only the US but also other countries.
The combination is a classic example of GOP / MAGA paranoia and fearmongering. You see perceived threats everywhere. It's pathetic.