The Remains of Bonnie Ray

[Richard Smith]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo.  HA HA HA.  The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.  Why else would Jackson direct attention to that particular window in the moments after the assassination?  Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.  Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting. 

[Walt Cakebread]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo.  HA HA HA.  The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.  Why else would Jackson direct attention to that particular window in the moments after the assassination?  Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.  Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

 Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

You'll have to wait forever.....  because you're not smart enough to OPEN your eyes and SEE.....   The window sill box was moved between the Powell and Dillard photos..... But you've got the chronology backwards....  Powell too his photo BEFORE Tom Dillard took his photo...

[Martin Weidmann]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo.  HA HA HA.  The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.  Why else would Jackson direct attention to that particular window in the moments after the assassination?  Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.  Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.

So this claim;

Robert Jackson took a photo of the window moments after the assassination because he saw the rifle.

was an outright lie, pure and simple.... Got it!

The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.

No. There is no corroboration at all. Dillard took a photo which does not show a rifle sticking out of the window.
Also, there is no confirmation that Dillard took the photo at Jackson's direction. You are making stuff up again.

Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.

When dealing with a proven habitual liar who doesn't give a damn about actual facts and evidence, like you, details and truth matter.

Your "obvious point" is more often than not just an assumption.

[Bill Chapman]

Dilliard:

"Bob Jackson said, "There's a rifle barrel up there." I said, "Where?" I had my camera ready. He said, "It's in that open window."

[John Iacoletti]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo. 

“Technically”? You claimed (twice) that Jackson saw a rifle and took a photo of the building. Now that your ignorance is on full display once again, you make this lame attempt to cover your tracks? You should be embarrassed.  “Minutia”, LOL.

The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo. 

The Dillard photo doesn’t show any rifle. It doesn’t “corroborate” squat.

Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

Comedy gold that “Richard” actually thinks that in order for something to have occurred, there needs to be an “explanation” invented for it. And at the same time he has no explanation for how Oswald could have gotten from the sixth floor to the second floor in 75 seconds without being seen or heard by any of the 12 people along the way.

So let’s use “Richard” “logic” and say that the “explanation” for the boxes being moved is that it happened.

[Walt Cakebread]

“Technically”? You claimed (twice) that Jackson saw a rifle and took a photo of the building. Now that your ignorance is on full display once again, you make this lame attempt to cover your tracks? You should be embarrassed.  “Minutia”, LOL.

The Dillard photo doesn’t show any rifle. It doesn’t “corroborate” squat.

Comedy gold that “Richard” actually thinks that in order for something to have occurred, there needs to be an “explanation” invented for it. And at the same time he has no explanation for how Oswald could have gotten from the sixth floor to the second floor in 75 seconds without being seen or heard by any of the 12 people along the way.

So let’s use “Richard” “logic” and say that the “explanation” for the boxes being moved is that it happened.

The Dillard photo doesn’t show any rifle. It doesn’t “corroborate” squat.

I disagree....I believe that the Dillard photo corroborates the fact that there was no sniper firing from the sixth floor....There most certainly isn't any gunman visible in any window..... and if a gunman had fired from the sixth floor window he would be visible in the photo.... 

[John Iacoletti]

Yeah Walt, but you are the only one who believes that the Dillard photo was taken during the shooting.

Regardless, “Richard’s” claim that the Dillard photo somehow corroborates Jackson seeing a rifle is ridiculous, even by “Richard” standards.

[Walt Cakebread]

Yeah Walt, but you are the only one who believes that the Dillard photo was taken during the shooting.

Regardless, “Richard’s” claim that the Dillard photo somehow corroborates Jackson seeing a rifle is ridiculous, even by “Richard” standards.

the Dillard photo somehow corroborates Jackson seeing a rifle is ridiculous,

There certainly isn't any rifle visible in the Dillard photo.....But I believe there would be  IF IF the shots were fired from there....

You may recall that Brennan said that AFTER he heard the first shot he looked up he saw a rifle ( "I could see all of the barrel of the gun" )

If Brennan saw the barrel of a rifle several seconds after the FIRST shot then that rifle barrel should be in the Dillard Photo also.....

WHY  isn't it there?......   Because.... Brennan did in fact see a rifle Barrel, BUT IT WAS NOT IN THE  "SNIPER"S NEST"WINDOW .....  Even his description of the man STANDING and bracing the rifle against the side of the window while aiming the rifle DOES NOT FIT   the "Sniper's Nest......  Brennan saw the man in about the same place that Arnold Rowland saw the man with the rifle....

Bottom line..... There were no shots fired from that "Sniper's Nest " window....