Blonde

[Martin Weidmann]

Trump has nothing to do with JFK, but since you stupidly brought this up there were no allegations that Trump abused women or took drugs while president.  Not even from a conspiracy theorist such as yourself.  He was a saint while president compared to liberal icons like Bill Clinton and JFK.  What matters from a national security perspective is conduct while president.

Hilarious.

Your "saint" was the biggest security risk the country has ever had.

[Michael Walton]

I think this thread is quite revealing and actually confirms everything I've always said. That is, people who think the government got it right on Kennedy's murder actually, deep down, don't like Kennedy, the family or whatever. So there's a heavy dose of bias involved.

It reminds me of the investigator who hated women in general, and whores specifically. Suppose a whore is found dead in an alley and this investigator has to find out who killed her. He'll do the least amount of work and secretly write it off as, "Eh, she deserved it."

The same here with Richard and many others who think the Feds got it right. They really don't like Kennedy and, therefore, Oswald did it alone and deep down, Kennedy "deserved it." I sure wouldn't want those kind of people investigating my loved one's murder.

[Martin Weidmann]

I think this thread is quite revealing and actually confirms everything I've always said. That is, people who think the government got it right on Kennedy's murder actually, deep down, don't like Kennedy, the family or whatever. So there's a heavy dose of bias involved.

It reminds me of the investigator who hated women in general, and whores specifically. Suppose a whore is found dead in an alley and this investigator has to find out who killed her. He'll do the least amount of work and secretly write it off as, "Eh, she deserved it."

The same here with Richard and many others who think the Feds got it right. They really don't like Kennedy and, therefore, Oswald did it alone and deep down, Kennedy "deserved it." I sure wouldn't want those kind of people investigating my loved one's murder.

 

[Richard Smith]

I think this thread is quite revealing and actually confirms everything I've always said. That is, people who think the government got it right on Kennedy's murder actually, deep down, don't like Kennedy, the family or whatever. So there's a heavy dose of bias involved.

It reminds me of the investigator who hated women in general, and whores specifically. Suppose a whore is found dead in an alley and this investigator has to find out who killed her. He'll do the least amount of work and secretly write it off as, "Eh, she deserved it."

The same here with Richard and many others who think the Feds got it right. They really don't like Kennedy and, therefore, Oswald did it alone and deep down, Kennedy "deserved it." I sure wouldn't want those kind of people investigating my loved one's murder.

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.  Just as the evidence confirms there was a conspiracy to kill President Lincoln.  If I were influenced by anti-liberal bias, then I would be onboard with conspiracy nuts who think LBJ was behind the assassination.  LBJ was the most liberal president in modern history.   LBJ, however, had absolutely nothing to do with the assassination. 

[Martin Weidmann]

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.  Just as the evidence confirms there was a conspiracy to kill President Lincoln.  If I were influenced by anti-liberal bias, then I would be onboard with conspiracy nuts who think LBJ was behind the assassination.  LBJ was the most liberal president in modern history.   LBJ, however, had absolutely nothing to do with the assassination.

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.

And what evidence would that be exactly?

Do you have evidence that can show that;

- the MC rifle found at the TSBD was fired?
- the MC rifle was in Oswald's possession on 11/21/63?
- Oswald brought the MC rifle into the TSBD?
- Oswald was on the 6th floor when the shots were fired?
- Oswald was in fact the shooter?
- Oswald managed to go down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot?

I don't believe you have any credible evidence for any of this, so what "evidence" are you constantly talking about?

[Richard Smith]

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.

And what evidence would that be exactly?

Do you have evidence that can show that;

- the MC rifle found at the TSBD was fired?
- the MC rifle was in Oswald's possession on 11/21/63?
- Oswald brought the MC rifle into the TSBD?
- Oswald was on the 6th floor when the shots were fired?
- Oswald was in fact the shooter?
- Oswald managed to go down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot?

I don't believe you have any credible evidence for any of this, so what "evidence" are you constantly talking about?

Off topic and asked and answered.  See WC report.  See HSCA Report.  If you have evidence that raises doubt of Oswald's guilt such as a concluding that "he didn't come down the stairs", please provide that to the DPD or NY Times.  Don't waste your time here.  Get back to us with their response. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Off topic and asked and answered.  See WC report.  See HSCA Report.  If you have evidence that raises doubt of Oswald's guilt such as a concluding that "he didn't come down the stairs", please provide that to the DPD or NY Times.  Don't waste your time here.  Get back to us with their response.

Shall I tell them that a guy calling himself Richard Smith is telling people that Oswald killed Kennedy without being able to support any of his claims with actual evidence?   

[Richard Smith]

Shall I tell them that a guy calling himself Richard Smith is telling people that Oswald killed Kennedy without being able to support any of his claims with actual evidence?   

I don't believe they are as obsessed with me as you are.  Why not tell "them" your evidence that leads you to conclude that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"?  If that is the case, then you have proven Oswald is innocent, and you are a conspiracy theorist as it is the only possible implication to be drawn from YOUR conclusion.  Get back to us with their response.  Sounds like a Pulitzer Prize winning story to exonerate Oswald.  That is if they believe it and accept your "evidence."  You don't do that yourself, but maybe they will have more confidence in your "evidence" than you do.