Iacoletti v Bug53

[Larry Baldwin]

You don't believe that Oswald fired a single shot on Nov 22, 1963. It seems to me that you're one who is delusional here. Maybe stay away until you can come up with something that exonerates your guy. Something that makes all of the evidence against him go away. Good luck with that.

There is enough evidence to exonerate Oswald already.  Your confirmation bias inhibits you from seeing it or accepting it.  I'm sure you see things the exact opposite.  We are well beyond agreeing to disagree, because of our passion on the matter.  That is why I will stay away.  God bless you though.

[Larry Baldwin]

And you're above all that?

I am now

Keep the laughs going, Chuckles. Who are the 12 people eye-locked on the backstairs in the minute after the assassination?

The 12 people thing was not my claim. In fact, I didn't make any claim.  It was what you argued with the absurd stadium analogy.  Still cracks me up.

[Larry Baldwin]

Y'all need to be fit for straight jackets.
Try 'straitjackets' next time, Einstein.

I stand corrected.

[John Iacoletti]

Keep the laughs going, Chuckles. Who are the 12 people eye-locked on the backstairs in the minute after the assassination?

Why would “eye-locking” be required?

[John Iacoletti]

You don't believe that Oswald fired a single shot on Nov 22, 1963. It seems to me that you're one who is delusional here.

Only if “delusion” is defined as “disagreeing with something Tim Nickerson believes on faith”.

Maybe stay away until you can come up with something that exonerates your guy. Something that makes all of the evidence against him go away. Good luck with that.

“All of the evidence against him”. LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald took his rifle - you really think it was his lunch? - and shot JFK.

“you really think it was his lunch?” Does not constitute evidence of murder.

Neither is “not being interested in what happened”.

Anyway, if someone doesn't believe the 8-10 witnesses who saw Oswald shoot Tippit or leave the scene
(and the other physical and circumstantial evidence) I doubt you'd accept witnesses who saw Oswald go down the stairs.

False equivalence. People who worked with Oswald knew who he was and saw him every day. They’re not being manipulated by unfair, biased lineups or an unfair, biased photo showup. Besides, only one person saw anybody shoot Tippit: Helen “didn’t recognize anybody in the lineup” “utter screwball” Markham.

And if powerful evil groups did pull this off you can be damned sure they would make Norman and Jarman and others say they saw that very same thing, Oswald going down the steps.

And there you go again. The omnipotent conspiracy that I just dreamed up in my head would make it look like Oswald did it, and it doesn’t look like Oswald did it. Therefore, Oswald did it.  This never gets old.

[Bill Chapman]

I reckon Helen misunderstood the question as meaning did she know any of these men before that day
Ball knew of that probability and was boorishly rude about it. The lout.