Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Iacoletti v Bug53  (Read 10209 times)

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5309
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2022, 12:37:09 AM »
Advertisement


And the red rings were apparently plastic "wreaths" that stuck to the window pane , and were NOT painted on the panes, because they were removed after the coup d'etat.

Source?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2022, 12:37:09 AM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #25 on: December 29, 2022, 08:07:34 PM »
Source?

Source for what?   You recognize that the red rings were a signal....   But you're too gutless to admit that signal was NOT for firemen.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5309
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2022, 04:01:04 PM »
Source for what?   You recognize that the red rings were a signal....   But you're too gutless to admit that signal was NOT for firemen.

Your idiotic claim that the red circles were "plastic 'wreaths' that stuck to the window pane."  Where did you come up with that one?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2022, 04:01:04 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2022, 04:02:22 PM »
His source is ... Myasspolis, Deep State of Pretendsylvania, Twin-Planet Duplicitous, Looniverse.

Ridicule of anybody expressing doubt about LBJ's proclamation that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone who murdered President Kennedy for no reason, has always been priority one for the government.  Their ploy has always been to present themselves as a CT with a ridiculous theory, that they could then mock and ridicule. 

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5309
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2022, 05:31:42 PM »
Ridicule of anybody expressing doubt about LBJ's proclamation that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone who murdered President Kennedy for no reason, has always been priority one for the government.  Their ploy has always been to present themselves as a CT with a ridiculous theory, that they could then mock and ridicule.

You got the part about it being a ridiculous theory right, but I simply asked you for the source of YOUR specific claim that the red circles on the TSBD windows were plastic wreaths.  I've never heard that one before.  Why not just say you made that up if that is the case?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2022, 05:31:42 PM »


Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1496
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2022, 06:00:49 PM »
You got the part about it being a ridiculous theory right, but I simply asked you for the source of YOUR specific claim that the red circles on the TSBD windows were plastic wreaths.  I've never heard that one before.  Why not just say you made that up if that is the case?
LBJ ordered/orchestrated the whole coverup, creation of the "Oswald as lone assassin" lie, and then got lucky that after he died that subsequent investigations, HSCA, news media, et cetera, concluded the same thing that he ordered done. How lucky can you get?

See? Even after they're all dead, LBJ dead, Hoover dead, Dulles dead, they were able to get subsequent generations of Americans in government and outside to cover for them.

If that isn't a deranged view of the world, of the country, then it's a damned good impersonation of one.


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5309
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2022, 06:30:49 PM »
LBJ ordered/orchestrated the whole coverup, creation of the "Oswald as lone assassin" lie, and then got lucky that after he died that subsequent investigations, HSCA, news media, et cetera, concluded the same thing that he ordered done. How lucky can you get?

See? Even after they're all dead, LBJ dead, Hoover dead, Dulles dead, they were able to get subsequent generations of Americans in government and outside to cover for them.

If that isn't a deranged view of the world, of the country, then it's a damned good impersonation of one.

The endless cover up is an essential part of conspiracy theories to explain why there is no evidence to support a conspiracy conclusion.  The circle of lunacy.  In some instance, the lack of evidence to support a conspiracy even becomes the evidence for a conspiracy.   The plastic "wreaths" are a new one, though.  I guess Walt has some vague awareness of the absurdity of suggesting that someone painted or taped red circles on the windows as a signal necessitating that they somehow be able to remove them if the plan changed etc.  It is very amusing.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2022, 11:15:33 PM »
You got the part about it being a ridiculous theory right, but I simply asked you for the source of YOUR specific claim that the red circles on the TSBD windows were plastic wreaths.  I've never heard that one before.  Why not just say you made that up if that is the case?

Says the guy who made up the claim that “evidence” shows Oswald was on the sixth floor firing a rifle at 12:30 and went down the staircase in 75 seconds without being seen or heard by 12 people along the way.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2022, 11:15:33 PM »