Oswald's Motive

[Martin Weidmann]

So you believe Oswald COULD have come down the stairs from the 6th floor after the assassination unnoticed by anyone in time for the encounter with Baker?  Thus, rendering your endless analysis on the topic of the stairs pointless in terms of whether he was the assassin.

More evasion.... from the guy who claims he has all the evidence for Oswald's guilt. Pathetic!

We already had this conversation and I am not going to have it again. My position is clear, no matter how many times you try to misrepresent it. Only a fool tries the same thing again and expects a different result.

Now, are you going to show that my conclusion about Oswald not coming down the stairs is wrong or not?

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald was”too calm”, therefore he shot the president. This is how ridiculous LN “evidence” is.

[John Iacoletti]

Robert Oswald, like other cult members, makes a series of claims that are either non-evidence, false, or not well supported by the actual evidence, forms a conclusion, and then says that it’s correct by default until somebody proves something different.

[John Iacoletti]

If I'm him and solely wanting to make money, just sell a book, that was not the book I write. I'm promoting a conspiracy, conspiracies sells. I'm not writing a lone assassin work.

Please. Bugliosi reportedly got a million dollar advance for his doorstop, which I doubt they ever recouped. I got one in the bargain bin a few months later.

[John Iacoletti]

Robert was openly critical of some of the WC’s work. For instance, Robert didn’t go along with the single bullet theory, at least not when he wrote the book.

It’s pretty hard to make a case for a single shooter without the single-bullet fantasy. That’s the whole reason it was invented.

[John Iacoletti]

So you believe Oswald COULD have come down the stairs from the 6th floor after the assassination unnoticed by anyone in time for the encounter with Baker?  Thus, rendering your endless analysis on the topic of the stairs pointless in terms of whether he was the assassin.

“COULD have”. LOL. You can either demonstrate that something happened or you cannot.

[Martin Weidmann]

“COULD have”. LOL. You can either demonstrate that something happened or you cannot.

Indeed, but we're dealing here with a fool who thinks that the evidence for Oswald coming down the stairs is the fact that it happened.

[Jon Banks]

Oswald was”too calm”, therefore he shot the president. This is how ridiculous LN “evidence” is.

“Oswald’s erratic behavior after he left the Book Depository proves his guilt”

“Oswald’s calmness while in police custody proves his guilt”

Seems like the LN crowd tries to have it both ways…