David Lifton has died

[Martin Weidmann]

Try to understand what you are reading.  I asked YOU what "credible evidence" YOU believe Lifton provided to support his theory.  And you responded by just repeating that "he provided a lot more credible evidence for his theory than you have ever have." LOL.  In other words you don't have a clue what you are talking about.  Again, deflecting the discussion to me instead of discussing the issue.

I asked YOU what "credible evidence" YOU believe Lifton provided to support his theory.

Yes and you are not entitled to an answer. I saw the question and ignored it, for one simple reason;

I have no intention to enter into any kind of discussion about Lifton's theories, based on your own pathetically biased opinions, in a thread that deals with the man's death.

Apparently you also had trouble understanding that. What else is new?



And you responded by just repeating that "he provided a lot more credible evidence for his theory than you have ever have."

Here we go again with the usual misrepresentation of what I actually said, which was;

I'm indicating that he provided a lot more credible evidence for his theory than you ever have provided for your own crackpot theories.

[Richard Smith]

I asked YOU what "credible evidence" YOU believe Lifton provided to support his theory.

Yes and you are not entitled to an answer. I saw the question and ignored it, for one simple reason;

Apparently you also had trouble understanding that. What else is new?



And you responded by just repeating that "he provided a lot more credible evidence for his theory than you have ever have."

Here we go again with the usual misrepresentation of what I actually said, which was;

I'm "not entitled to an answer"?  HA HA HA.  Are you a child?  You made an affirmative statement.  I just asked you to clarify it.  Caught out once again.  First, it was Oswald "didn't come the stairs" but then refusing to explain whether that meant you have concluded Oswald wasn't the assassin.  Now it's Lifton had "credible evidence" for his bizarre body alteration theory, but you won't tell us what "credible evidence" you are making reference to.   Take up a different contrarian cause.  This one is not working out.

[Sean Kneringer]

I watched a few of his vids on his YouTube channel last night. Some observations:

1. All the assassination films have been altered.
2. The foot in the Miller photograph belonged to SS Agent John Ready, not Kennedy or Hill. Oh, you didn't realize that Ready jumped into the limousine in Dealey Plaza when the car came to a stop?
3. The Dallas doctors were right-wingers who let Kennedy die.
4. McNamara was in on it.
5. RFK entered AF1 on the dark side of the plane not seen by cameras. Problem is, we have video evidence of him ascending the forward staircase as others deplaned:



And I haven't even gotten to the body alteration nonsense.

 

[Martin Weidmann]

I'm "not entitled to an answer"?  HA HA HA.  Are you a child?  You made an affirmative statement.  I just asked you to clarify it.  Caught out once again.  First, it was Oswald "didn't come the stairs" but then refusing to explain whether that meant you have concluded Oswald wasn't the assassin.  Now it's Lifton had "credible evidence" for his bizarre body alteration theory, but you won't tell us what "credible evidence" you are making reference to.   Take up a different contrarian cause.  This one is not working out.

I'm "not entitled to an answer"?  HA HA HA.  Are you a child?

No, I was talking to you as if you were a child so you might actually understand something for once. It seems it was in vain.

You made an affirmative statement.  I just asked you to clarify it.

After I had already stated that I was not going to enter into any kind of discussion about Lifton's theories in this thread.

First, it was Oswald "didn't come the stairs" but then refusing to explain whether that meant you have concluded Oswald wasn't the assassin.

Liar! This was explained to you over and over again. It's not my problem that you have a comprehension problem, as clearly demonstrated by you asking the same already answered question over and over again.

Now it's Lifton had "credible evidence" for his bizarre body alteration theory

Where exactly did I say that? You wouldn't be making stuff up again, would you now?

[John Iacoletti]

Where exactly did I say that? You wouldn't be making stuff up again, would you now?

Of course he is. He’s Strawman “Smith” — always demanding answers while providing none of his own.

[Louis Earl]

David Lifton tried to make sense of the inconsistencies in the recollections of numerous trained medical personnel about the condition of JFK's body in Dallas v. his body in Bethesda.  Like many others, I cannot buy his theory but I don't think its wise or justified to toss out the bacy with the bath. 

[Richard Smith]

I'm "not entitled to an answer"?  HA HA HA.  Are you a child?

No, I was talking to you as if you were a child so you might actually understand something for once. It seems it was in vain.

You made an affirmative statement.  I just asked you to clarify it.

After I had already stated that I was not going to enter into any kind of discussion about Lifton's theories in this thread.

First, it was Oswald "didn't come the stairs" but then refusing to explain whether that meant you have concluded Oswald wasn't the assassin.

Liar! This was explained to you over and over again. It's not my problem that you have a comprehension problem, as clearly demonstrated by you asking the same already answered question over and over again.

Now it's Lifton had "credible evidence" for his bizarre body alteration theory

Where exactly did I say that? You wouldn't be making stuff up again, would you now?

Page after page of this nonsense.  You indicated that there was more "credible evidence" to support Lifton's body alteration theory than the case for Oswald's guilt.  I asked a simple question about what evidence you found "credible" to support his theory.  You refused to answer questioning whether you made the statement.  So clear it up for us.  Do you believe there is "credible evidence" that supports Lifton's theory or not?  If not, we are in agreement.  If you do, however, enlighten us with what you find credible.  Spare us the endless personal commentary and insults and try to focus on the topic.

[Richard Smith]

David Lifton tried to make sense of the inconsistencies in the recollections of numerous trained medical personnel about the condition of JFK's body in Dallas v. his body in Bethesda.  Like many others, I cannot buy his theory but I don't think its wise or justified to toss out the bacy with the bath.

Why not if his theory is absurd and baseless?  No reasonable person can believe that the plan was to frame Oswald by linking him to a specific rifle and shooting location but then using a different rifle and shooting location to commit the assassination.   Why do that when the conspirators could have just used Oswald's rifle and fired the shots from the 6th floor?  Thereby eliminating the incredibly risky and complicated necessity of stealing the president's body.  Of all the far out CTer theories, the most outrageous is that someone stole JFK's body and returned it before the autopsy.  That is tin foil hat stuff that should be rejected without reservation by everyone.