Tucker Carlson on the Kennedy Assassination

[Andrew Mason]

But what annoys me the most is that there's currently no one in the so called "Liberal media" that questions US foreign policies and challenges the military industrial complex as strongly as Tucker does. People like Michael Moore and Oliver Stone have basically been neutered by today's Liberal media which frequently defends the FBI and CIA.

Maybe it is because the "liberal media" requires evidence before reporting a story. 

[Patrick Jackson]

It's all fake...
Told you.

[Jon Banks]

Maybe it is because the "liberal media" requires evidence before reporting a story.

Only true if you’ve forgotten their lack of critical reporting on WMDs during the run-up to the Iraq war and their frequent mistakes in reporting on Trump from 2016-2020.

All news reporting contains some level of bias. The mainstream media tends to be biased in favor of the national security state and people within the US national security state were uncharacteristically rattled by Trump. I mean, hundreds of articles about Trump were published citing nothing more than anonymous sources as evidence.

And the mainstream media tends to accept anonymous intelligence sources as credible often even though those types of stories have a mixed record for accuracy.

So while I don’t think Tucker citing an anonymous CIA source is good journalism, he’s not alone. That sort of thing happens often nowadays.

And regardless of whether it’s true or not, it’s newsworthy given the size of Carlson’s audience…

[Richard Smith]

Tucker has posted a lot of nonsense about UFOs and vaccines.  He is sometimes off the mark but I give him credit for questioning what he is told.  Something the mainstream leftist media never does.  They are foot soldiers for the Biden administration.  If a woman is arrested for silently praying by authoritarian goons, it is only someone like Tucker who comes to their defense. Tucker has one of the most highly rated shows on cable TV.  Why don't our contrarian CTers go to him with their evidence that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" and Lifton's body alteration nonsense?  He is clearly not part of the endless conspiracy to cover up the JFK assassination.

[John Iacoletti]

Because Tucker is an even bigger purveyor of nonsense than “Richard Smith”.

[Jon Banks]

Tucker has posted a lot of nonsense about UFOs and vaccines.  He is sometimes off the mark but I give him credit for questioning what he is told.  Something the mainstream leftist media never does.  They are foot soldiers for the Biden administration.  If a woman is arrested for silently praying by authoritarian goons, it is only someone like Tucker who comes to their defense. Tucker has one of the most highly rated shows on cable TV.  Why don't our contrarian CTers go to him with their evidence that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" and Lifton's body alteration nonsense?  He is clearly not part of the endless conspiracy to cover up the JFK assassination.

Today the term "Conspiracy Theory" is applied to pretty much anything the mainstream media doesn't want to talk about. The problem with them doing that is that sometimes, the stuff that they label "Conspiracy Theories" are partially or mostly true.

As I said earlier, the only good thing to me about Tucker is that he covers topics that most of the mainstream media won't touch. And he occasionally allows Leftwing commentators like Glenn Greenwald to come on his show and speak out against the national security state and US foreign policies.

In the absence of any similar content in the so called "Liberal Media", I give Tucker credit for that even though I disagree with him most of the time on most topics.

[Tom Scully]

And they were vindicated...

Investigations proved that the FBI spied on Trump's campaign and that the "Russia collusion" stuff originated from Clinton campaign's opposition research. That stuff wouldn't have been exposed if Hillary won in 2016.

And we know that some in the media tried to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story despite the fact that the DHS confirmed in 2020 that it wasn't a product of Hacking or Russian propaganda.

I would enjoy watching you attempt to support your conclusion with links to credible sources. All you've done in your post is support that John Durham (and Musk's paid stooges)_accomplished their real purpose, right wing extremist disinfo history alteration, as opposed to non-partisan, evidence justified indictments and prosecutions. Opinions that Trump is anyone's victim are unfounded signs of extremist radicalization.

https://twitter.com/awprokop/status/1204173871869571072

[Mark A. Oblazney]

I would enjoy watching you attempt to support your conclusion with links to credible sources. All you've done in your post is support that John Durham (and Musk's paid stooges)_accomplished their real purpose, right wing extremist disinfo history alteration, as opposed to non-partisan, evidence justified indictments and prosecutions. Opinions that Trump is anyone's victim are unfounded signs of extremist radicalization.

https://twitter.com/awprokop/status/1204173871869571072

Prokop twittered that right before the pandemic.  Then it gets lost in the pancake.