This nonsensical evasion is beyond disingenuous. I know you cannot be so naive as to sincerely believe such polemic. We both know what you're doing here. Since you cannot explain away the evidence, you resort to this silliness.
Instead of this mumbo jumbo, why not try to respond to my straightforward question? If you believe your own "evidence" making it "clear" that there was a conspiracy, why not present that evidence to law enforcement or media sources to get the case reopened? That is what any reasonable person would do if they believed they had evidence relating to any murder much less the assassination of the president. Doesn't the fact that you limit your "clear" or "obvious" evidence to an Internet forum suggest some dim awareness that you don't really believe it yourself? There is some subconscious understanding that this is just a fantasy or hobby and not a real thing.
