Evidence of Serious Election Fraud in the 2020 Election

[Michael T. Griffith]

If anyone wants more information and sources on this evidence of serious election fraud in the 2020 election, I recommend that you check out my website on the 2020 election:

https://sites.google.com/view/electionfraudin2020/home

Let's take a quick look at some odd facts about Biden's supposed vote total.

* There was a historic disparity between Biden's alleged vote total and his number of counties won. According to the certified results, Biden shattered Barack Obama's 2008 record for number of votes by a whopping 12 million votes, but Biden won 37% fewer counties than Obama won. Obama received 69 million votes while winning 875 counties, but we are asked to believe that Biden won 81 million votes while winning 551 counties, 324 fewer counties than Obama won. Democrats have offered several lame explanations for this massive disconnect ("people move," "huge turnout"). Suffice it to say that never in the history of U.S. elections has there been such a huge disparity between the number of votes and the number of counties won.

* Mail-in ballot rejection rates in the 2020 election were two to 10 times lower than in any previous election, varying by state, even though the 2020 election had a record number of such ballots.

* Biden somehow got 16 million more votes than Hillary got in 2016, even though Trump got 12 million more votes than he got in 2016, even though Trump sizably increased his share of the black vote, the Hispanic vote, and the Asian vote, and even though Trump increased his share of the overall male vote and the overall female vote.

According to the NYT exit polls, compared to 2016, Trump's share of the black vote rose by 50% (from 8% to 12%); his share of the Hispanic vote rose by 10% (from 29% to 32%); his share of the Asian vote rose by 17% (from 29% to 34%); and his share of "other" minorities rose by 11% (from 37% to 41%). And those four voting blocks accounted for 34% of all voters in the election.

What's more, Trump's share of the white vote rose by 1.7% (from 57% to 58%), and white voters accounted for 67% of all voters. Surprisingly (at least to some)--and, again, this is according to the NYT exit polls--Trump's share of the LGBT vote rose by a whopping 96% (from 14% to 27%), and LGBT voters accounted for 7% of all voters.

So we can readily see where and how Trump got 12 million more votes than he got in 2016. But it is not at all apparent where Biden could have gotten the extra millions of votes that were credited to him.

* An audit ordered by the Arizona Senate found evidence that 200,000 mail-in ballots had signature mismatches--i.e., the signature on the ballot did not match the signature on file. Biden "won" Arizona by just 11K votes.

* In Wisconsin, which Biden "won" by just 20K votes, a special counsel investigation found that 91 nursing homes had an astounding, unprecedented voter turnout rate of 95-100%. Investigators interviewed family members of many of the seniors in those nursing homes, and they repeatedly insisted that their loved ones were in no condition to vote and had not voted in years.

* Republicans clobbered Democrats in state legislative races in NH, GA, and WI, running up large majorities in both chambers in those states, yet somehow Trump supposedly lost those states.

* There are videos that show election workers illegally preventing GOP election observers from entering voting facilities. We know that at least, at the very least, well over 600,000 ballots in PA alone were counted without any observers being present.

* There are videos that show election workers illegally covering the windows of voting centers to prevent GOP observers from even observing the vote-counting through windows.

* There are videos that show GOP election observers being illegally forced to sit 50-100 feet away from vote-counting areas.

* An especially damning and disturbing video is the surveillance video that shows election workers in the largest vote-counting facility in GA (the State Farm Arena in Atlanta) pulling out crates of ballots and counting them late at night after GOP election observers had departed.

* There are hundreds of sworn statements from election observers documenting cases where election workers ignored obvious differences in mail-in ballot signatures and envelopes, ignored major missing information on mail-in ballots, and scanned ballots multiple times, among other violations.

[Jon Banks]

This horse is deader than dead.

Anything is possible but the courts have rejected the evidence that alleges that the 2020 election was rigged against Trump.

I think Trump might've won in 2020 if he handled Covid-19 more responsibly.

[Michael T. Griffith]

FYI, about 20 minutes ago, I realized that many of the links on my election fraud website were links from my old domain and were thus broken. I've now fixed all the broken links.

This horse is deader than dead.

Anything is possible but the courts have rejected the evidence that alleges that the 2020 election was rigged against Trump.

Actually, the courts never explained the evidence of election fraud presented to them in the various lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign. In nearly all cases, the courts issued summary judgments and did not even pretend to address the evidence. In the few non-summary judgments, such as in Wisconsin, the courts rejected the evidence with brief, superficial dismissals and made no effort to explain it. See, for example, the 4-3 ruling of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, where the majority simply ignored the evidence while dismissing, as the minority opinion, written by the court's chief justice, notes.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rbzbQS2FTYvio2Qt4xuEuVoRsQ36LqqL/view

I think Trump might've won in 2020 if he handled Covid-19 more responsibly.

Oh? What should he have done differently? Plus, Trump did not control the COVID policies that governors imposed. If anything, Trump supported the CDC's deeply flawed recommendations for too long.

Furthermore, the evidence indicates that Trump did not lose but actually won.

[Richard Smith]

I think Trump might've won in 2020 if he handled Covid-19 more responsibly.

What exactly should he have done differently?  What did Old Joe do differently when he took over EVEN after Trump had gifted him a vaccine?  A million Americans and counting have died.  The vast majority under Biden.  Hundreds are still dying every day over two years after he took over.  The media and Biden are just ignoring it now.  Old news.  Nothing to see.  They gather in mass events with no masks etc.  It's suddenly fine.   There was nothing that realistically could have been done.  China is learning that now.  A total lockdown only delays the inevitable.  Everyone was always going to get COVID.  Biden has gotten himself multiple times.  The media used the pandemic, as they attempted to use fake conspiracies like "Russian collusion," to finally get Trump.  It worked.  It was a politically driven narrative.  Trump's big mistake was shutting the entire country down.  The focus should have been limited on the most vulnerable - the elderly and infirmed - and everyone else should have gone about their business, got COVID, and recovered.  There was little risk to healthy people.  Instead the Dems nearly destroyed the entire country for politics.  A shameful legacy.

[Jon Banks]

October 2020 - Trump's handling of coronavirus pandemic hits record low approval: Reuters/Ipsos poll

Americans are steadily losing confidence in President Donald Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, with his net approval on the issue that has dominated the U.S. election hitting a record low in a new Reuters/Ipsos poll.

The poll taken Tuesday through Thursday, after Trump’s COVID-19 infection and weekend hospitalization, found 37% of American adults approved of the president’s handling of the pandemic and 59% disapproved.

The net approval rating of negative 22 percentage points is the lowest in the poll dating back to March 2 and has steadily declined over the last 10 days, as Trump’s illness and his return to work in the White House dominated news headlines.

Trump has repeatedly dismissed the severity of the pandemic as something that would disappear on its own and chided Democratic rival Joe Biden for wearing a protective mask even though the virus has killed more than 210,000 people in the United States and thrown millions out of work...

Trump has continued to play down the respiratory disease’s dangers even after contracting the illness and has been censured by social media platforms for spreading misinformation about it.

“I think this was a blessing from God that I caught it. This was a blessing in disguise,” Trump said in a video posted to his Twitter account on Wednesday...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-coronavirus/trumps-handling-of-coronavirus-pandemic-hits-record-low-approval-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN26T3OF


Regardless of how you feel about Trump's handling of Covid, polls consistently showed that Americans disapproved of the way he handled it. And Covid was one of the top issues of the 2020 election. Given that the election was so close (the Electoral College, not the popular vote), I feel that Trump might've won if he dealt with Covid with more maturity. Just my honest opinion.

[Richard Smith]

October 2020 - Trump's handling of coronavirus pandemic hits record low approval: Reuters/Ipsos poll
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-coronavirus/trumps-handling-of-coronavirus-pandemic-hits-record-low-approval-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN26T3OF


Regardless of how you feel about Trump's handling of Covid, polls consistently showed that Americans disapproved of the way he handled it. And Covid was one of the top issues of the 2020 election. Given that the election was so close (the Electoral College, not the popular vote), I feel that Trump might've won if he dealt with Covid with more maturity. Just my honest opinion.

There is no doubt that COVID was a huge reason that the Trump lost the election.  The question is whether that was the product of a legitimate failing or the Dems and media relentless propaganda campaign to politicize the situation.  It is not clear even until today what exactly Trump could have done differently that he did not do at the time.  He shut the entire country down.  He promoted development of a vaccine in record time.  Governors of the individual states were responsible for the policies of those states.  A novel virus is extremely contagious.  Everyone was going to get it eventually.   A short lockdown was perhaps helpful to better understand who COVID was affecting.  It became apparent early on that younger and healthier people were not at any great risk.  At that point, these folks should have been allowed to return to work and school and the focus should have been placed on protecting the elderly.   People have continued to die under Biden and the media simply ignores it.  They don't go into hysterics when there is a meeting at the WH with no masks etc.   The pandemic served its purpose.  A means to damage Trump.  It worked.  They moved on once Trump was out of office. 

[Joe Elliott]

If anyone wants more information and sources on this evidence of serious election fraud in the 2020 election, I recommend that you check out my website on the 2020 election:

https://sites.google.com/view/electionfraudin2020/home

Let's take a quick look at some odd facts about Biden's supposed vote total.

* There was a historic disparity between Biden's alleged vote total and his number of counties won. According to the certified results, Biden shattered Barack Obama's 2008 record for number of votes by a whopping 12 million votes, but Biden won 37% fewer counties than Obama won. Obama received 69 million votes while winning 875 counties, but we are asked to believe that Biden won 81 million votes while winning 551 counties, 324 fewer counties than Obama won. Democrats have offered several lame explanations for this massive disconnect ("people move," "huge turnout"). Suffice it to say that never in the history of U.S. elections has there been such a huge disparity between the number of votes and the number of counties won.

. . .

If one shoots down one argument, Griffith will just come up with three other bogus arguments. But instead of playing that game, let's concentrate on Griffith's lead point. How could Biden, with many more votes than Obama, win fewer counties? The answer is simple.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election

In 2008, the vote totals were:
Obama/Biden: 69,498,516     52.9 % of the votes
McCain/Palin: 59,948,323     45.7 % of the votes

In 2020, the vote totals were:
Biden: 81,268,924     51.3 % of the votes
Trump: 74,216,154     46.9 % of the votes

What matters, of course, is not the total number of votes, but the percentage of the votes one gets, compared to their opponent. So, in 2008, for every 100 voters who voted Republican, 116 voted Democratic. In 2020, for every 100 voters who voted Republican, 109 voted Democratic. So, naturally despite getting more than 11,000,000 more votes in 2020 than 2008, the Democrats didn't win as many counties in 2020. Duh...h, who could have figured that?

The surprising feature of the 2020 election, was the percentage of voters who could vote who did vote. This was the highest percentage in any American Presidential election, since 1900, when a former Union Army Civil War won the election. Why was the percentage so astoundingly high in 2020? Because of COVID-19 which opened up the number of mail-in ballots that could be submitted (so as to minimize person to person contact). So we didn't have a lot of voters decide at the last minute not to vote like we usually have. Because they were tired from work, felt they were coming down with a cold, had car problems, had a sick child, or all sorts of different reasons.

What is amazing is the high percentage of voter turn out in 1900. Very limited mail-in ballots. Half the population farmers. Most of them would have to travel miles to vote, on foot or horseback, in early November. Not by car. And yet, in 2020, we barely had a higher percentage voter turn out than 1900. Over a century ago, Americans were really dedicated to being good citizens.

On s separate note, Biden did not hold large political rallies with lots of people, as is usually done in Presidential election years, in order to limit the spread of COVID-19. While Trump encourage them to do so. That is why Trump attracted thousands to his rallies, while Biden attracted none to his, or even attempted to hold a rally. So that's why we see videos of thousands of rabid Trump supporters, but none at all for Biden. Duh...h.

 * * * * *

Of course, if Griffith wishes to contest this, he will ignore his lead argument, Biden had more votes in 2020 but fewer (as Vice President) in 2008 yet won fewer counties. Griffith will instead seek to change the subject and discuss some other bogus claim he would like to make.

[Richard Smith]

If one shoots down one argument, Griffith will just come up with three other bogus arguments. But instead of playing that game, let's concentrate on Griffith's lead point. How could Biden, with many more votes than Obama, win fewer counties? The answer is simple.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election

In 2008, the vote totals were:
Obama/Biden: 69,498,516     52.9 % of the votes
McCain/Palin: 59,948,323     45.7 % of the votes

In 2020, the vote totals were:
Biden: 81,268,924     51.3 % of the votes
Trump: 74,216,154     46.9 % of the votes

What matters, of course, is not the total number of votes, but the percentage of the votes one gets, compared to their opponent. So, in 2008, for every 100 voters who voted Republican, 116 voted Democratic. In 2020, for every 100 voters who voted Republican, 109 voted Democratic. So, naturally despite getting more than 11,000,000 more votes in 2020 than 2008, the Democrats didn't win as many counties in 2020. Duh...h, who could have figured that?

The surprising feature of the 2020 election, was the percentage of voters who could vote who did vote. This was the highest percentage in any American Presidential election, since 1900, when a former Union Army Civil War won the election. Why was the percentage so astoundingly high in 2020? Because of COVID-19 which opened up the number of mail-in ballots that could be submitted (so as to minimize person to person contact). So we didn't have a lot of voters decide at the last minute not to vote like we usually have. Because they were tired from work, felt they were coming down with a cold, had car problems, had a sick child, or all sorts of different reasons.

What is amazing is the high percentage of voter turn out in 1900. Very limited mail-in ballots. Half the population farmers. Most of them would have to travel miles to vote, on foot or horseback, in early November. Not by car. And yet, in 2020, we barely had a higher percentage voter turn out than 1900. Over a century ago, Americans were really dedicated to being good citizens.

On s separate note, Biden did not hold large political rallies with lots of people, as is usually done in Presidential election years, in order to limit the spread of COVID-19. While Trump encourage them to do so. That is why Trump attracted thousands to his rallies, while Biden attracted none to his, or even attempted to hold a rally. So that's why we see videos of thousands of rabid Trump supporters, but none at all for Biden. Duh...h.

 * * * * *

Of course, if Griffith wishes to contest this, he will ignore his lead argument, Biden had more votes in 2020 but fewer (as Vice President) in 2008 yet won fewer counties. Griffith will instead seek to change the subject and discuss some other bogus claim he would like to make.

What you have highlighted is that there was a statistical outlier in terms of the number of votes cast in the 2020 election.  Both Biden and Trump received more votes than any other candidate in history.  What is not answered is why?  Was there such great enthusiasm for Biden, an elderly white guy who hardly campaigned, that he received tens of millions more votes than Reagan, FDR, JFK, Obama, Clinton or any other candidate in history? That doesn't seem to add up.  What happened is that the political establishment changed the voting laws in the months leading up to the election and those changes affected the outcome in a significant way.  The vast majority of the votes cast using the alternative methods went to Biden whereas the votes for Trump were cast at the polls.  Trump overstates that as "stealing" the election but those changes certainly altered the outcome.  If the reverse had occurred, and Trump had won the election based on significant changes made in the election laws in the months preceding the election, the Dems would have revolted and the media would gone on an endless campaign to suggest that Trump's election was not legitimate.  Always hypocrisy.