Only hypothetically.
Yet, we have seen it insinuated many times that the absence of anyone reporting seeing LHO on the stairs just after the assassination is evidence that he couldn’t have been there.
And if there had been no LHO prints found in the sniper’s nest we would have a loud chorus of nay sayers and CTers asking “how could he have built the sniper’s nest and left no prints?” Also, “how could he have even been in the sniper’s nest and left no prints?”
I smell something….
Yet, we have seen it insinuated many times that the absence of anyone reporting seeing LHO on the stairs just after the assassination is evidence that he couldn’t have been there.Well, the WC seemed to think that. That's why they tried to discredit with a bogus argument and why they ignored Dorothy Garner completely.
The actual claim, by the LNs, is that Oswald came down the stairs after the last shot, but there is not a shred of evidence for that claim. In fact, all the available evidence, considered in the correct context, makes it just about impossible that he could have gone down the stairs unseen, within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot. But that he wasn't seen isn't evidence that he wasn't there. You just don't get to assume that he was there. If you claim that he came down the stairs, you need to prove it.
And if there had been no LHO prints found in the sniper’s nest we would have a loud chorus of nay sayers and CTers asking “how could he have built the sniper’s nest and left no prints?” Also, “how could he have even been in the sniper’s nest and left no prints?” This is just silly. There is no evidence that Oswald or anybody else placed those boxes in that corner. They all must have left prints, but - as Latona tells us - prints on cardboard don't hold very well or very long. The whole fingerprint thing has no evidentiary value one way of the other.
I smell something….Let me guess... your own BS perhaps?
