So to summarize. Oswald's prints were found on the SN boxes. Prints were taken from the other TSBD employees who worked on that floor. None of their prints were identified, as Oswald's were, as being on those same boxes. They also "worked there" but left no such identifiable prints. Only Oswald did. Such bad luck. And here we learn that for some unspecified reason, that Day would lie AFTER Oswald's death about finding prints on the rifle EVEN if he were not involved in a conspiracy to frame Oswald. Why he would do this is left to our imagination since there would be no prosecution of Oswald after his death and the only possible reason to lie about the prints would be to frame him for the crime and allow the guilty person to escape. And Day's confirmation of finding Oswald's prints on the rifle is a "lie" because there is no "report" of him mentioning it for a whole week! Of course, he very well could have done so verbally and there was simply no report to be made in that timeframe. And even if he did not mention it, that alone does not cast doubt on his confirmation that it happened.
Nobody asked for your flawed and bogus "summary".
Prints were taken from the other TSBD employees who worked on that floor. None of their prints were identified, as Oswald's were, as being on those same boxes. They also "worked there" but left no such identifiable prints. Only Oswald did. And didn't that come in handy, right?
And here we learn that for some unspecified reason, that Day would lie AFTER Oswald's death about finding prints on the rifle EVEN if he were not involved in a conspiracy to frame Oswald. Why he would do this is left to our imagination since there would be no prosecution of Oswald after his death and the only possible reason to lie about the prints would be to frame him for the crime and allow the guilty person to escape. A far better question to ask (which is why you ignore it, of course) is; Why didn't Day say something when the FBI reported there were no prints on the rifle and Oswald was still alive? What possible reason could Day have had to stay silent?
the only possible reason to lie about the prints would be to frame him for the crimeYou've answered your own question!
How many (now proven) innocent people were convicted again over the years by Henry Wade and his corrupt ilk? In all those cases they allowed the guilty person to escape, right?
And Day's confirmation of finding Oswald's prints on the rifle is a "lie" because there is no "report" of him mentioning it for a whole week! Of course, he very well could have done so verbally and there was simply no report to be made in that timeframe.And now we're in La La Land. Again, finding a print of Oswald on the rifle used to kill Kennedy would be a big thing. The mere fact that Day allegedly managed to keep that print in his desk for six days means nobody knew about it or it simply wasn't there to begin with. Besides, nobody has ever come forward to confirm that Day told him about the print before Oswald died!
And even if he did not mention it, that alone does not cast doubt on his confirmation that it happened. Only in your fantasy world. In the real world holding back a crucial piece of evidence for six days is not only a massive dereliction of duty but also destroys the chain of custody required for such evidence.