When the SN was built

[Martin Weidmann]

Yet, If no prints of LHO had been found in the sniper’s nest these clowns would claim the evidentiary value was of extreme importance.     

Why would a reasonable person do that? Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. There is no evidentiary value either way, but it is extremely telling that LNs need this kind of desparate argument to even begin to make a case.

[John Iacoletti]

In which we learn that Oswald left so much evidence behind that we can only conclude he was innocent. 

Says the guy who still has yet to demonstrate that Oswald left any evidence behind.

[John Iacoletti]

Maybe this one helps clarify Strawman a little better for you. You seem to be struggling with it a little bit. It is probably because you are trying to use the concept to hide the fact you posted something that was completely wrong then denied it and are now embarrased by having done it.

I don’t know how to make this any simpler for you. You claimed that I believe that Williams or Givens constructed a sniper’s nest. I don’t believe that, and I never said anything like that. You made it up. It’s a strawman. Now what was the thing I posted that was “completely wrong”? And answer that without making up another strawman. Use a direct quote.

LHO leaving his fingerprints all over the place seems to be causing a lot of anguish.

The only one who seems to be in anguish is you, trying to do backflips to turn this into evidence of murder.

With your help we now know he constructed the SN.

We know nothing of the kind.

The fingerprints on the bag indicate he carried the bag exactly the way Linnie Mae Randal described.

 , how? And even if this is true, this is evidence of …. what? What about the way Frazier said he carried his package? And the fact that they described a different package than the magic, invisible CE142?

It is proven he purchased and possessed the rifle which was found on the 6th floor and matched to the bullet, fragments, and shells.

  “Proven” how?

Brennan saw a man firing the second and last shot from the SN.

Also  . Brennan didn’t even say that.

Nothing further is needed to understand who was the assassin.

Maybe not for somebody who bases his “understandings” on claims that are false, unsubstantiated, or irrelevant.

[John Iacoletti]

You got one thing correct.  Oswald touched the boxes very shortly before the DPD discovered them on 11.22!  HA HA HA.  Good catch.

Even if that is correct, it’s still anybody’s guess what “Richard” thinks this proves. “Very shortly”. LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

Yet, If no prints of LHO had been found in the sniper’s nest these clowns would claim the evidentiary value was of extreme importance.     

The straw is getting really thick in here.

[John Iacoletti]

Why would a reasonable person do that? Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. There is no evidentiary value either way, but it is extremely telling that LNs need this kind of desparate argument to even begin to make a case.

 

Exactly. Anything and everything becomes “evidence” when speculation is all you’ve got.

[Charles Collins]

The straw is getting really thick in here.

Only hypothetically.

Exactly. Anything and everything becomes “evidence” when speculation is all you’ve got.

Yet, we have seen it insinuated many times that the absence of anyone reporting seeing LHO on the stairs just after the assassination is evidence that he couldn’t have been there.


And if there had been no LHO prints found in the sniper’s nest we would have a loud chorus of nay sayers and CTers asking “how could he have built the sniper’s nest and left no prints?” Also, “how could he have even been in the sniper’s nest and left no prints?”

I smell something….

[Alan Ford]

Yet, we have seen it insinuated many times that the absence of anyone reporting seeing LHO on the stairs just after the assassination is evidence that he couldn’t have been there.

We have seen it insinuated many times that the absence of anyone reporting seeing LHO on the front steps during the assassination is evidence that he couldn’t have been there.

And if there had been no LHO prints found in the sniper’s nest we would have a loud chorus of nay sayers and CTers asking “how could he have built the sniper’s nest and left no prints?” Also, “how could he have even been in the sniper’s nest and left no prints?”

And if there had been no LHO print presented as having been found in the sniper's nest we would have a loud chorus of Warren Gullibles asking "could he not have wiped the box clean?" Also, "doesn't this prove he wasn't framed for the crime?"