When the SN was built

[Alan Ford]

No photographic evidence of anyone who stated they didn’t see LHO on the stairs near or on the stairs between the sixth floor and second floor during the time in question. That’s one significant difference.

Do you have photographic evidence of Mr. Truly and Officer Baker in the second-floor lunchroom during the time in question? And does the lack of such lead you to doubt their claims?

[Charles Collins]

Do you have photographic evidence of Mr. Truly and Officer Baker in the second-floor lunchroom during the time in question? And does the lack of such lead you to doubt their claims?

Timed trials and film of Baker entering the building are significant.

[Martin Weidmann]

Timed trials and film of Baker entering the building are significant.

The only thing that you find significant is anything that fits your predetermined opinion about what allegedly happened.

[John Iacoletti]

No, Strawman has just now replaced gaslighting as the popular term to use to escape a faltering argument.

“Strawman” is the popular term to use when somebody is making a strawman argument.
 

There were only three possible choices to build the SN. Givens, BRW, and LHO.

Why are those the only three possible choices? And how do you even know that boxes were moved for the purpose of building a “sniper’s nest” at all?

LHO’s prints are on every piece of evidence. He purchased the rifle and had no alibi during the assassination. The Rolling Reader boxes specifically have his prints on them and were moved from the other 8 boxes and they were specifically used in the construction of the rifle rest. They were moved there for the express purpose of being used to build the SN. Brennan saw and stated he saw the second shot being fired from the SN.

Well, that’s certainly a laundry list of unsubstantiated claims. Would you care to substantiate them with actual evidence?

[Alan Ford]

Timed trials and film of Baker entering the building are significant.

So........... no photographic evidence of them in the lunchroom at the time in question. Do you believe that this renders their story open to doubt?

 

[Alan Ford]

Mr. Shelley (or some other member of the flooring crew [internal OR external] who is in on the plot) sees Mr. Oswald, in the course of his order-filling duties, touching a box on six, before the internal crew take their lunch break. He takes note of the box. This box is later singled out and brought to the SN window (by a conspirator wearing gloves) and placed there to incriminate Mr. Oswald.

**

CAPTAIN FRITZ: Okay, Lee, have you ever seen this sack before? Here, take a good look at it before you answer.

**

See how easy this is?

And what makes it so easy is the abject inability of the Warren Gullibles to place
-------------a sufficiently lengthy package in Mr. Oswald's hands that morning
-------------Mr. Oswald at the SN window at 12.30pm that day

 

[Charles Collins]

So........... no photographic evidence of them in the lunchroom at the time in question. Do you believe that this renders their story open to doubt?

 

I have no reason to doubt.

[Charles Collins]

Mr. Shelley (or some other member of the flooring crew [internal OR external] who is in on the plot) sees Mr. Oswald, in the course of his order-filling duties, touching a box on six, before the internal crew take their lunch break. He takes note of the box. This box is later singled out and brought to the SN window (by a conspirator wearing gloves) and placed there to incriminate Mr. Oswald.

**

CAPTAIN FRITZ: Okay, Lee, have you ever seen this sack before? Here, take a good look at it before you answer.

**

See how easy this is?

And what makes it so easy is the abject inability of the Warren Gullibles to place
-------------a sufficiently lengthy package in Mr. Oswald's hands that morning
-------------Mr. Oswald at the SN window at 12.30pm that day

 

What makes this nonsense so easy is that making up stories with no basis in reality is child’s play.