Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Box Dimensions?  (Read 9187 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2023, 01:50:41 AM »
Advertisement
And Oswald moved some of the boxes as confirmed by his prints.

So--------------the very, very best this can ever give you still won't be enough to put Mr. Oswald at the SN window at 12:30pm

 Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2023, 01:50:41 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2023, 02:01:24 AM »
Of course, Oswald's prints on the SN boxes are not the only evidence.  His prints are also on a long bag next to the window.  Fired shell casings from a rifle belonging to him are by the window from which witnesses confirm the shots were fired.  And, oh yeah, his rifle was left on the floor.

Even if we were to be foolish enough to accept all your claims here, Mr. Smith, you would still only have an evidentiary pattern that is ambiguous-----------it could point to Mr. Oswald as (suicidally stupid) lone gunman; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) gunman in a conspiracy; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) non-gunman but accomplice; Mr. Oswald as innocent patsy.

You guys are still running on empty Thumb1:

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2023, 02:47:18 AM »
And Oswald moved some of the boxes as confirmed by his prints.  Guilty!

LHO was not involved in laying the floor and moving the boxes. Using the boxes for a rifle rest was totally his idea. Additionally, the boxes were unopened, he had no reason to be handling them. The viability of the prints was a maximum of 24 hours.

LHO is the only person whose fingerprints are on every piece of evidence. Guilty and executed. Ruby saved a lot of effort and expense with a 5 cent bullet.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2023, 02:47:18 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2023, 10:17:33 AM »
Of course, Oswald's prints on the SN boxes are not the only evidence.  His prints are also on a long bag next to the window.  Fired shell casings from a rifle belonging to him are by the window from which witnesses confirm the shots were fired.  And, oh yeah, his rifle was left on the floor.    He fled the scene and murdered a police officer.  Oswald lied to the DPD about his ownership of the rifle and many other things.  But us gullible types are just accepting the "official" story.  Cue sinister music.

But us gullible types are just accepting the "official" story.

Well, let's see....

You blindly accept that there was indeed "a long bag next to the window", just because a cop said so.

You blindly accept that the rifle found at the TSBD was "his rifle" despite the fact that it doesn't match the description of the rifle Oswald allegedly ordered.

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty gullible.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2023, 10:29:09 AM »
LHO was not involved in laying the floor and moving the boxes. Using the boxes for a rifle rest was totally his idea. Additionally, the boxes were unopened, he had no reason to be handling them. The viability of the prints was a maximum of 24 hours.

LHO is the only person whose fingerprints are on every piece of evidence. Guilty and executed. Ruby saved a lot of effort and expense with a 5 cent bullet.

See this here------------the mishmash of factual statement + speculation + outright falsehood + frothing at the mouth? 1 2, skip a few, 99, 100!

Just the latest demonstration that Warren Gullibility is a midwit cult for those who lack even the basic skills of critical thinking

 Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2023, 10:29:09 AM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2023, 02:00:45 PM »
So far, after considerable study and a lot of helpful advice (thanks), I have come up with some revised dimensions. These estimates are just that (estimates) because it would take someone actually measuring the boxes at the national archives to obtain accurate measurements. So, here are the estimates:

Box “A” - (CE 641 and CE 1306): 13”w x 9”d x 8.5”h

Box “B” - (CE 653 and CE 1308): 13”w x 9”d x 8.5”h

Box “C” - (CE 654 and CE 1309): 17”w x 11.5”d x 14”h

Box “D” - (CE 648 and CE 1307): 17.5”w x 11.75”d x 13”h

I have revised the first post in this thread to reflect the changes…
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 04:46:23 PM by Charles Collins »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2023, 02:52:17 PM »
The Trolls have just polluted yet another well-meaning and on-track research thread.


It seems that those folks would rather argue the SOS over and over again than learn anything.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2023, 03:36:33 PM »
And Oswald moved some of the boxes as confirmed by his prints.  Guilty!

Yeah, because in WC-apologist wonderland, touching boxes is evidence of murder.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Box Dimensions?
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2023, 03:36:33 PM »