Box Dimensions?

[John Iacoletti]

His prints are also on a long bag next to the window.

LOL.

[Richard Smith]

Poor Oswald.  So unlucky again.  In his role as an "order filler", he somehow managed to be the ONLY TSBD employee to leave his prints on the very boxes found in SN.   And these are unopened boxes.  So his bad luck continued.  He apparently was the ONLY TSBD employee who had to move these very boxes to get to his stock! HA HA HA.  The contrarians can't even believe this defense attorney nonsense. 

[Richard Smith]

So--------------the very, very best this can ever give you still won't be enough to put Mr. Oswald at the SN window at 12:30pm

 

Other than a time machine it is difficult to understand how there could be any more evidence of the fact.  What do you believe is lacking?  The shots were fired from the 6th floor window at 12:30.  Fired bullet casings from a rifle belonging to Oswald were found by that window.  Oswald's prints are on the SN boxes.  His prints are on a long bag found near that window.  His rifle is left on that floor.  He has no credible alibi, flees the building within minutes, kills a police officer and lies to the police about the rifle and many other things.  It is a drumbeat of guilt.  Criminals take measures to avoid detection while committing the act.  Not every crime is captured on film.  That does not create any doubt, however, when a mountain of evidence is left at the scene.  Guilty.

[Alan Ford]

Other than a time machine it is difficult to understand how there could be any more evidence of the fact.  What do you believe is lacking?  The shots were fired from the 6th floor window at 12:30.  Fired bullet casings from a rifle belonging to Oswald were found by that window.  Oswald's prints are on the SN boxes.  His prints are on a long bag found near that window.  His rifle is left on that floor.

You can keep on reproducing this McAdams boilerplate till you're blue in the face, Mr. Smith, it still won't get you anywhere.

Let me repeat:

Even if we were to be foolish enough to accept all your claims here, you would still only have an evidentiary pattern that is ambiguous-----------it could point to Mr. Oswald as (suicidally stupid) lone gunman; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) gunman in a conspiracy; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) non-gunman but accomplice; Mr. Oswald as innocent patsy.

But I do sympathize with you in your frustration, Mr. Smith, I really do.

Concerned regards.......... 

[Martin Weidmann]

Other than a time machine it is difficult to understand how there could be any more evidence of the fact.  What do you believe is lacking?  The shots were fired from the 6th floor window at 12:30.  Fired bullet casings from a rifle belonging to Oswald were found by that window.  Oswald's prints are on the SN boxes.  His prints are on a long bag found near that window.  His rifle is left on that floor.  He has no credible alibi, flees the building within minutes, kills a police officer and lies to the police about the rifle and many other things.  It is a drumbeat of guilt.  Criminals take measures to avoid detection while committing the act.  Not every crime is captured on film.  That does not create any doubt, however, when a mountain of evidence is left at the scene.  Guilty.

Unable to provide credible evidence to support his claims and absolutely incapable of debating an issue honestly, Richard, true to form, just repeats the same old flawed and bogus claims over and over hoping that somehow one day they might become true.   

[Alan Ford]

Unable to provide credible evidence to support his claims and absolutely incapable of debating an issue honestly, Richard, true to form, just repeats the same old flawed and bogus claims over and over hoping that somehow one day they might become true.   

Since losing their McAdams Comfort Zone, they've migrated here with their nonsense. Every time they're forced beyond their little Bugliosi talking points, they expose their own lack of seriousness!

[Richard Smith]

You can keep on reproducing this McAdams boilerplate till you're blue in the face, Mr. Smith, it still won't get you anywhere.

Let me repeat:

Even if we were to be foolish enough to accept all your claims here, you would still only have an evidentiary pattern that is ambiguous-----------it could point to Mr. Oswald as (suicidally stupid) lone gunman; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) gunman in a conspiracy; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) non-gunman but accomplice; Mr. Oswald as innocent patsy.

But I do sympathize with you in your frustration, Mr. Smith, I really do.

Concerned regards.......... 

I'm not sure that I understand your logic.  Fired bullet casings from OSWALD'S rifle were found by the window from which the shots were fired.  OSWALD'S prints were on the SN boxes used as a gun platform (no other TSBD employee left prints on those boxes).  OSWALD'S rifle was left as the scene of the shooting.  OSWALD had no credible alibi, he fled the scene, and murdered a police officer.  But you still think that even if all that is accurate, that it still doesn't link him to the crime?  Unreal.

[Richard Smith]

Unable to provide credible evidence to support his claims and absolutely incapable of debating an issue honestly, Richard, true to form, just repeats the same old flawed and bogus claims over and over hoping that somehow one day they might become true.   

Maybe "seagulls" framed Oswald?  Right?  They are apparently industrious birds according to Martin from "Europe."