This is the usual fallacious “my unsubstantiated claims about the evidence are true or else you must prove that a giant conspiracy faked and planted everything” argument.
Nope. Strawman and false dichotomy.
Nope, sorry. Regardless of any outcome of any of these ridiculous rhetorical false dichotomies, you still cannot demonstrate that Oswald ever used Hidell as an alias for himself. And even if you could, it still would tell you nothing about who killed Kennedy or Tippit.
This is the true rabbit hole here: “Mytton” going to absurd lengths to avoid actually having to demonstrate the veracity of his claims.
This is the usual fallacious “my unsubstantiated claims about the evidence are true or else you must prove that a giant conspiracy faked and planted everything” argument.
Nope. Strawman and false dichotomy.
At one point or another you have tried to refute almost every point on my long list but your equally long list of objections must equally lead to a logical culmination of an alternative narrative, right?
The Hidell evidence that is directly associated with Oswald was either made/directed by Oswald, or there was other people involved because the mountain of evidence didn't just suddenly magically appear, someone had to create it, plant it and lie about it.
Also consider that someone had the evidence planted in some very unconnected obscure places, then someone had civilians, multiple law enforcement officers and a Postal inspector lie about it?
You must be able to see the can of worms you have opened and it has to go somewhere. Even the OJ defence team realized this and created an alternate story.
The sensible solution and Occam's razor conclusion is simply that Oswald invented the Hidell alias and ordered his rifle through legitimate channels which was processed and sent out by Kleins, because the alternate conspiracy flavoured narrative by definition leads to a co-ordinated mess of biblical proportions which could have become unstuck in a myriad of ways but for some reason it all went flawlessly, is that how the real World works?
Nope, sorry. Regardless of any outcome of any of these ridiculous rhetorical false dichotomies, you still cannot demonstrate that Oswald ever used Hidell as an alias for himself. And even if you could, it still would tell you nothing about who killed Kennedy or Tippit.
That's not quite true, anybody using and ordering rifles and revolvers with an alias strongly suggests that they were planning to use said weapons in a way so that the weapons would not have a direct connection with themselves. While Oswald was stupidly carrying the Hidell ID that doesn't mean it was intentional, in the short time he had to prepared he may have simply forgot, or perhaps he planned on using the Hidell as a "get out of jail card for free" in case he was questioned by Police, maybe he thought he could flash his card and not be Lee Harvey Oswald.
I hope that next time you have a knee jerk response to a piece of evidence that you seriously consider where your alternate narrative leads.
JohnM
