The Walker Case

[John Mytton]

Classic "Mytton". It demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that "Mytton" (once again) made up something that I am supposed you have said, but didn't. It also shows he isn't the least bit interested in asking me about what he now calls "Martin's vague speculative post" because he already knows I am going to call him out for outright lying, so he just calls me "heavily biased to further elaborate".

Now that John has him pinned down (I guarantee you he will deny that), "Mytton" decides to move the goalposts to divert attention away from his made up arguments by bringing up a so-called "expert" (quotations marks added by "Mytton"!).

How somebody like "Mytton" can be taken seriously is a complete mystery to me.

And here we go again, your obsession to repeatedly mention me in replies that aren't even to me, every chance you get, is absolutely fascinating, I must be getting right under your skin but in a good way!

JohnM

[Charles Collins]

Here’s a link to an apparently recent and informative article regarding the Walker bullet (CE 573):

http://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/walker-bullet-ce-573-is-it-real

I disagree with the conspiracy related “conclusions” that the article suggests. But the article does provide some interesting background information about the Walker bullet controversy.

If you scroll down, almost half way, there is a paragraph regarding a memo dated May 4, 1964 from Rankin to Hoover. The footnote [8] for this memo includes a link to this document:

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62229#relPageId=119

In the memo, the Walker bullet is item #5 out of 37 items listed. I didn’t see a link to Hoover’s reply to this memo included in the K & K article. And I am beginning a search for this reply. But I usually have a difficult time finding these things. So, if anyone can help direct me to the reply I would appreciate it very much.

[John Iacoletti]

You can't be serious, your following question is the very foundation of this entire discussion and they both answered your question with flying colours. Next!

And you responded by quoting a post from Martin that said nothing of the kind. Now you’re trying to cover your tracks by pretending you meant something else the entire time.

Nice try.

[John Iacoletti]

In the memo, the Walker bullet is item #5 out of 37 items listed. I didn’t see a link to Hoover’s reply to this memo included in the K & K article. And I am beginning a search for this reply. But I usually have a difficult time finding these things. So, if anyone can help direct me to the reply I would appreciate it very much.

Charles, I believe the response to this memo is the anonymously written (and factually disputed) letter known as CE 2011.

[Charles Collins]

Charles, I believe the response to this memo is the anonymously written (and factually disputed) letter known as CE 2011.

Thanks, I will check it out.

[John Mytton]

And you responded by quoting a post from Martin that said nothing of the kind. Now you’re trying to cover your tracks by pretending you meant something else the entire time.

Nice try.

Everyone can see your question and I've replied with 3 examples, 1 you dispute and the other two, Griffith and Thompson more than adequately answer your question. Nuff said.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Everyone can see your question and I've replied with 3 examples, 1 you dispute and the other two, Griffith and Thompson more than adequately answer your question. Nuff said.

Everyone can see how highly dishonest you are:

[John Mytton]

Everyone can see how highly dishonest you are:

LOL!

JohnM