Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Walker Case  (Read 32595 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2023, 03:47:46 AM »
Advertisement
So, the note must be about shooting Walker because it can be narrowed down to a particular 10 month period that happens to include that event.

Brilliant.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2023, 03:47:46 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4276
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2023, 05:53:37 AM »
So, the note must be about shooting Walker because it can be narrowed down to a particular 10 month period that happens to include that event.

Brilliant.

Moreover, the reference in paragraph 3 to paying "I paid the house rent on the 2d so don't worry about it." would be consistent with the period when the Oswalds were living on Neely Street since the apartment was rented on March 3, 1963. Oswald had paid the first month's rent in advance on March 2, 1963, and the second month's rent was paid on either April 2 or April 3
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-4.html



Along with when the photos of Walkers house were taken.

An examination of certain construction work appearing in the background of this photograph revealed that the picture was taken between March 8 and 12, 1963, and most probably on either March 9 or March 10.



Along with when the rifle Money Order was sent and when Kliens sent C2766 to Oswald's PO box

Oswald purchased the money order for the rifle on March 12, the rifle was shipped on March 20



And the same approximate time that photos showing Oswald holding the same type of 40 inch Carcano in the Backyard of Neeley street were taken. Indicated by the growth of the surrounding plants.



This still to be disproven HSCA photo collage shows the exact same rifle photographed at Neely street to be the same rifle found on the 6th floor.



Oswald was surrounded by incredible coincidences, that poor poor unlucky boy.

JohnM
« Last Edit: June 30, 2023, 06:35:56 AM by John Mytton »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2023, 06:13:19 PM »
Moreover, the reference in paragraph 3 to paying "I paid the house rent on the 2d so don't worry about it." would be consistent with the period when the Oswalds were living on Neely Street

“Consistent with” is lawyer rhetoric for “possibly”.

Quote
Along with when the photos of Walkers house were taken.

Still waiting for you to explain how these photos show who fired a shot at Walker.

Quote
Along with when the rifle Money Order was sent and when Kliens sent C2766 to Oswald's PO box

Too bad you can’t show that any such rifle was sent or picked up.

Quote
Oswald purchased the money order for the rifle on March 12, the rifle was shipped on March 20

Too bad you can’t show that either of these claims are correct.

Quote
And the same approximate time that photos showing Oswald holding the same type of 40 inch Carcano in the Backyard of Neeley street were taken.

You don’t know when the backyard photos were taken. Marina said February.

Quote
This still to be disproven HSCA photo collage shows the exact same rifle photographed at Neely street to be the same rifle found on the 6th floor.

There’s no need to disprove something that hasn’t been proven in the first place.

Quote
Oswald was surrounded by incredible coincidences, that poor poor unlucky boy.

Only contrived “coincidences” made up by somebody with an agenda misrepresenting the actual evidence.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2023, 06:13:19 PM »


Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #19 on: July 01, 2023, 03:42:40 PM »
Oswald personally was aware of Edwin Walker and had a motive but the evidence linking him to the attempted murder of Walker is mostly circumstantial.

So while I think it’s reasonable for Oswald to be considered a suspect, I don’t think he would’ve been convicted based on the known evidence against him…

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5283
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #20 on: July 01, 2023, 03:59:02 PM »
Oswald personally was aware of Edwin Walker and had a motive but the evidence linking him to the attempted murder of Walker is mostly circumstantial.

So while I think it’s reasonable for Oswald to be considered a suspect, I don’t think he would’ve been convicted based on the known evidence against him…

Oswald confessed to his own wife on the night of the attempt before the general public was even aware it had happened.  He had photos of Walker's home.  He left a note explaining to Marina what to do in case he was arrested or killed. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #20 on: July 01, 2023, 03:59:02 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #21 on: July 01, 2023, 05:57:47 PM »
Oswald confessed to his own wife on the night of the attempt before the general public was even aware it had happened.

Marina said a lot of things.

"We cannot ignore, however, that Marina Oswald has repeatedly lied to the Service, the FBI, and this Commission on matters which are of vital concern to the people of this country and the world.” - Norman Redlich to Lee Rankin

Quote
  He had photos of Walker's home.

No, they were in Ruth Paine's garage.

Quote
  He left a note explaining to Marina what to do in case he was arrested or killed.

No mention of Walker or shooting.

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #22 on: July 01, 2023, 10:11:26 PM »
Oswald confessed to his own wife on the night of the attempt before the general public was even aware it had happened.  He had photos of Walker's home.  He left a note explaining to Marina what to do in case he was arrested or killed.

Marina said lots of things that were either inaccurate or outright wrong. She also had a very poor memory it appears.

And lastly, she wouldn’t have been able to testify against her husband had he lived to stand trial.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2023, 10:55:12 PM »
Marina said lots of things that were either inaccurate or outright wrong. She also had a very poor memory it appears.

And lastly, she wouldn’t have been able to testify against her husband had he lived to stand trial.

And lastly, she wouldn’t have been able to testify against her husband had he lived to stand trial.

Not completely true, but I doubt a prosecutor would have called her to testify even if she agreed to it.

On the other hand, with her husband dead and "cooperating with the investigators" to prevent from being deported to the USSR, she could have told them anything they wanted to hear, making her just about the most unreliable witness there is. And that's the person the WC completely relied on to build their case against Oswald... Go figure

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2023, 10:55:12 PM »