Maybe you could try reading what he actually writes instead of trying to invent “where he is leading”. Or ask him and actually pay attention to the answer.
Anyway, this is going nowhere and we can endlessly debate "Martin's" vague speculative post and ask "Martin" who's heavily biased to further elaborate which we must agree will obviously be a waste of time and achieve nothing,
JohnM
Classic "Mytton". It demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that "Mytton" (once again) made up something that I am supposed you have said, but didn't. It also shows he isn't the least bit interested in asking me about what he now calls "Martin's vague speculative post" because he already knows I am going to call him out for outright lying, so he just calls me "heavily biased to further elaborate".
Now that John has him pinned down (I guarantee you he will deny that), "Mytton" decides to move the goalposts to divert attention away from his made up arguments by bringing up a so-called "expert" (quotations marks added by "Mytton"!).
How somebody like "Mytton" can be taken seriously is a complete mystery to me.