The Walker Case

[John Iacoletti]

The researcher hasn’t been identified in this thread.

Be sure to include the circumstances and any evidence that Odum “went on the record” with this.

But you’re perfectly happy to accept a thirdhand anonymous account of what Odum did instead.

[John Iacoletti]

CE2011 is the FBI’s official response to a letter from a presidential commission to the head of the FBI (JEH). Therefore it is reasonable to believe that CE2011 would be accurate.

And this is the crux of where we diverge on what constitutes reliable evidence. “FBI letter says so” isn’t inherently any more reliable than “Gary Aguilar says so”.

Remember, Hoover had a pre-existing agenda to “convince the public that Oswald was the real assassin”.

Smearing Aguilar as “inept” and Odum as “old” doesn’t make an anonymously written thirdhand account any more reliable.

[John Iacoletti]

Suspicions is all you have. A faulty memory and some “missing” documents does not in any way prove any misrepresentation by the FBI.

What makes you think his memory was “faulty”? Just because you want to believe something else?

[John Iacoletti]

There could be any number of reasons that no trace was found.

But the same FBI that you rely on, took an imprint from Oswald's rifle from the exact same place that Day on the day took the palmprint impression from Oswald's rifle

What is your evidence that the FBI took a lift from the “exact same place”? What is your evidence that they even asked Day for this information?

What is your evidence that Hoover’s indistinct smudge is a “perfect match” rather than 5 cherry-picked spots that could be similar?

What is your evidence that the photos that Rusty Livingston pulled out of a briefcase 30 years later with no provenance or chain of custody were of the CE139 rifle?

Where is Scalise’s report showing specifically what he matched and how?

[John Mytton]

Remember, Hoover had a pre-existing agenda to “convince the public that Oswald was the real assassin”.

The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find any matching prints on C2766?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find an exclusive match of the trigger guard prints?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't exclusively match rifle fibers to Oswald's shirt fibers?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't say the backyard photo exclusively showed C2766?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't exclusively match the revolver bullets to Oswald's revolver?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find any exclusive rifle marks in the rifle bag?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find an exclusive match to the fibers found in the rifle bag to Oswald's blanket?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't exclusively match the fibers found in Oswald's jacket to Oswald's shirt?
The same Hoover's FBI who only found two matching block letters on a rifle coupon?
Etcetera etcetera

That Hoover's FBI is the one you're talking about, right? LMFAO!

Geez John it appears that Hoover's FBI did everything by the book, that is except where you specifically are looking for conspiracy!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

None of this has anything to do with the Walker case.

This is really disingenuous. If CE2011 can be shown to be unreliable, then it’s all unreliable. Why are there no actual reports written by the agents who are being spoken for there?

[John Iacoletti]

I find Oswald's history interesting and it's worth people knowing what sort of person Oswald was.

No, it’s just one of your many fallacies. This one being ad hominem.

Your propaganda needs to be exposed early and often.

[John Iacoletti]

The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find any matching prints on C2766?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find an exclusive match of the trigger guard prints?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't exclusively match rifle fibers to Oswald's shirt fibers?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't say the backyard photo exclusively showed C2766?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't exclusively match the revolver bullets to Oswald's revolver?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find any exclusive rifle marks in the rifle bag?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't find an exclusive match to the fibers found in the rifle bag to Oswald's blanket?
The same Hoover's FBI who couldn't exclusively match the fibers found in Oswald's jacket to Oswald's shirt?
The same Hoover's FBI who only found two matching block letters on a rifle coupon?
Etcetera etcetera

Wow, you’re making an excellent case for reasonable doubt. Well done!

That Hoover's FBI is the one you're talking about, right? LMFAO!

I didn’t say “Hoover’s FBI”, I said “Hoover”. But nice try.