Is their any evidence that the Kleins microfilm "missing"?

[John Mytton]

You concluded that "based on the evidence that he [Bugs] constructed a good book.

How did you come to that conclusion?

Beyond what I wrote, I don't understand what you are asking?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Beyond what I wrote, I don't understand what you are asking?

JohnM

Well, that would fit the average LN profile...

But how did you conclude that Bugs' "constructed a good book."?

[John Mytton]

But how did you conclude that Bugs' "constructed a good book."?

As I said, "based on the evidence"
Either add something new or I'm not responding.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

As I said, "based on the evidence"
Either add something new or I'm not responding.

JohnM

Based on what evidence? And how did you determine that evidence to be authentic?

[John Iacoletti]

I know Bugs made some mistakes but I believe overall based on the evidence that he constructed a good book.

Of course you do.

[John Mytton]

And how did you determine that evidence to be authentic?

Sorry Martin that's not how it works, if I have any reason to consider the evidence to be inauthentic, then please explain in detail why?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Sorry Martin that's not how it works, if I have any reason to consider the evidence to be inauthentic, then please explain in detail why?

JohnM

Sorry Martin that's not how it works,

That's exactly how it works. You claim to have concluded, based on the evidence, that Bug's book is a "good book"

That justifies the question what evidence it is you are talking about.

[John Mytton]

Sorry Martin that's not how it works,

That's exactly how it works. You claim to have concluded, based on the evidence, that Bug's book is a "good book"

That justifies the question what evidence it is you are talking about.

The same evidence that two separate inquiries 15 years apart concluded that Oswald pulled the trigger, now explain why it's your opinion that this evidence is not authentic?

JohnM