Who do you believe?

[John Iacoletti]

For the record, at the time he attended the lineup, Brennan did pick Oswald as most resembling the man (of all the lineup "suspects") who he saw in the window.

While this may not be a proof positive identification, it is also inaccurate to state that Brennan did not identify Oswald in the lineup.

Not inaccurate at all.  The one of the four who "most resembled" who he saw is NOT the same as identifying Oswald as the one he saw.

Besides, that is specifically not what you're supposed to be instructed to do in a lineup.

[John Iacoletti]

Yes, old Lee took his over two-foot long lunch bag to the lunchroom and had a leisurely meal while the motorcade drove by.  He, the most politically minded person in the entire workforce who had read JFK's book, had no interest whatsoever in the president driving by that day.

Only in Richard's fantasy world is this somehow "evidence" of murder.

And his fingerprints showing up on the SN boxes by the very window from which the shots were fired, just another wild streak of bad luck.

A guy whose job was to get books out of boxes left fingerprints on book boxes.  How unlikely.

  And after going to the considerable risk to frame Oswald for this crime, of course the conspirators would just let him roam about in the public parts of the building like a lunchroom where he could very well have been seen (as CTers allege here) and been given an alibi.  Thankfully the person who did see him decided to hold off a decade or so to tell her story.  That is the kind of lunacy that you are dealing with here.

And there you go again with the "fantasy conspirators" strawman.

[John Iacoletti]

And nobody is asking you to deal with anything, or stay either Martin. And if my "open ended questions" as you call them, bother you don't respond. The question on here is "Who do you believe? Oswald or Arnold?"

This is another loaded question.  What Oswald supposedly said and what Arnold said are not mutually exclusive.  That was explained to you several pages back.

[Bill Chapman]

Only in Richard's fantasy world is this somehow "evidence" of murder.

A guy whose job was to get books out of boxes left fingerprints on book boxes.  How unlikely.

And there you go again with the "fantasy conspirators" strawman.

Fingerprints that reveal he pushed the box forward, pointing right down Broadway. How likely.

[Martin Weidmann]

Fingerprints that reveal he pushed the box forward, pointing right down Broadway. How likely.

How exactly do fingerprints reveal that?

[John Iacoletti]

Fingerprints that reveal he pushed the box forward, pointing right down Broadway. How likely.

Broadway?  Where do you think this murder happened?

[Wesley Johnson]

Wow. You really subscribed to the LNer talking book, didn't you? For someone who is new here you sure make a lot of broad generalizations about CTers. It's almost as if you were here for years.

Of course I get no replies as you LNers have NO SUPPORTING evidence at all to counter with. You can't even cite any evidence showing that LHO was guilty.

Blah, blah, blah. All you do is repeat the same old crap. If there is no evidence in the case then what are you going on about and trying to dispute? Hilarious. I do enjoy a good laugh and you guys never fail.

[Bill Chapman]

Blah, blah, blah. All you do is repeat the same old crap. If there is no evidence in the case then what are you going on about and trying to dispute? Hilarious. I do enjoy a good laugh and you guys never fail.

Storing is one of the brainiacs who claim that the DPD rushed the TT solely to arrest a man who didn't buy a ticket.