RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

[Royell Storing]

No. You'd don't handle a situation like that. He was a government official. Any official would have seen the bullet, picked it up, and reported it immediately to a superior or colleague. You DON'T pick it up, lay it on a towel, and walk away from it and THEN decide to write a book about it 60 years later. It sounds like pure bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns.

And if the quotes and disclaimers I pulled from the VM article mean nothing to you, then it sounds like you're one of the many others who fall for stuff like this.

       All of us have seen the film footage of Lt. Day carrying the alleged Carcano by its' strap as he walked right down Elm street and then eventually got into his car parked at the curb. Or how about the willy-nilly manner that SA Hickey was handling that AR-15 with "one in the barrel" in the back seat of the Queen Mary? Yet you do not believe a govt official would, "handle a situation like that"? You're kidding yourself.

[Andrew Mason]

No Secret Service agent would put a bullet on a stretcher.

But you could also say, with the same level of incredulity, that no Secret Service agent would come out with a story 60 years after the event that conflicted with his original statements and saying that he put a bullet on a stretcher.

[Royell Storing]

Royell is back too? It’s like old home week!

   Hey John. Have you checked out "You Tube" lately? "The JFK Theorist" has posted 2 visually decent versions of The Darnell Film. The detail in the train yard with Roger Craig along with that alleged motorcycle cop behind him is very good. Also gives us a better but not great look behind the Black Dog Man Nook and The Bench. That area behind the wall that Hargis ran up to remains a Black Hole to this day. Also, there is a "between the sprocket holes" version of the Bell Film. Looks to be the same HD Bell Film that was offered in bits and pieces on "The Lost Bullet" DVD. There is also a lot of different people offering "walk throughs" of Dealey Plaza detailing the LOS from a myriad of directions. One guy flew a drone over Dealey Plaza and the TSBD and filmed that LOS. Lotta stuff offered there that can be discussed in detail here.

[Jon Banks]

No. You'd don't handle a situation like that. He was a government official. Any official would have seen the bullet, picked it up, and reported it immediately to a superior or colleague. You DON'T pick it up, lay it on a towel, and walk away from it and THEN decide to write a book about it 60 years later. It sounds like pure bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns.

And if the quotes and disclaimers I pulled from the VM article mean nothing to you, then it sounds like you're one of the many others who fall for stuff like this.

It’s fine to criticize how Landis handled the evidence (I’m sure he’s aware that it was a mistake) but let’s not pretend that he was the only police officer or federal agent who mishandled JFK assassination evidence.

[Royell Storing]

It’s fine to criticize how Landis handled the evidence (I’m sure he’s aware that it was a mistake) but let’s not pretend that he was the only police officer or federal agent who mishandled JFK assassination evidence.

   It's difficult to admit to the mishandling of alleged evidence, when you have a pension riding on your staying in line. Lotta people remained silent due to this being understood and a NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement) having been forced upon them. White House photog Robert Knudsen and his "sealed" HSCA Testimony of seeing autopsy photos of probes in the body of JFK being a case on point. 

[Alan Ford]

No. You'd don't handle a situation like that. He was a government official. Any official would have seen the bullet, picked it up, and reported it immediately to a superior or colleague. You DON'T pick it up, lay it on a towel, and walk away from it and THEN decide to write a book about it 60 years later.

Seems to me your first point here offers an explanation for why he might have kept quiet for so many years about how he acted: embarrassment.

But now, as he hits 90, his conscience tells him to come clean before it's too late.

[Alan Ford]

What's freaking out the Warren Gullibles about this Landis thing is not just Mr. Landis' story itself but also the fact that it is getting not unsympathetic coverage from legacy media

[Michael Walton]

What's freaking out the Warren Gullibles about this Landis thing is not just Mr. Landis' story itself but also the fact that it is getting not unsympathetic coverage from legacy media

That's EXACTLY what VF, the author of the book and the article author are hoping to happen. I've seen this way too many times over the years. Case in point - Clint the SS guy started off as a guy who was shaken by the murder and tried to be honest about what happened that day [circa late 60s]. Then, when the money machine kicks in and there's plenty of suckers to be had, he starts writing *SHOCKING NEWS ABOUT THE MURDER -- BUY HIS BOOK!!!* BS.

This Landis thing is no different and that's what we're seeing - the guy who just so happens to work at the same publishing company as Landis takes a "keen" interest in his long-lost tale, Landis writes the book, then the other guy writes an article in a "major" media outlet. All just in time two months before the 60th anniversary for the books to start flying of off the shelves.