Dr. David Mantik who has examined the autopsy photographs more than any other person, says that when you view the pictures like I have presented there is a two dimensional wet photo matte that has been applied to the back of these pictures when viewing them sterioscopically. I trust experts like this rather than you! You and John can continue to believe in these fake photographs. It is your right. I do not expect Oswald only believers to change or me to change them. Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael
The picture you presented is a drawing!!
The big question is - is it a fake drawing?
And just to check - this is your big evidence for Z-film alteration?
Even though Jenkins, O' Connor, Riebe, Humes and Boswell all describe the massive head wound we see in the autopsy pics, that's not good enough for you.
The Z-film, the autopsy pics and the testimonies of virtually everyone involved with the autopsy agree on the same massive wound. All this corroborating evidence.
You are the believer Michael.
You are the one who has to rely on faith.
You have zero evidence, only faith.
You must ignore all this corroborating evidence because your faith is so strong.
[Mantik] says that when you view the pictures like I have presented there is a two dimensional wet photo matte that has been applied to the back of these pictures when viewing them sterioscopically.Out of interest, do you know what this means?
Do you know what a "wet photo matte" is and can you explain it's relevance in this instance?