Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Yet Another Shooter??  (Read 23267 times)

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3160
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #48 on: October 27, 2023, 09:27:01 AM »
Advertisement
    I never said you could, "see the end of the picket fence". That guy/kid on Towner 3 is not at, "the end of the fence".

You seem a bit befuddled Royell. This is from your Reply#34:

"...we also see the (N) end of the picket fence."

And this is from your Reply#40:

"Not only do we see the (N) end of the Picket Fence..."

You repeatedly reference seeing the end of the picket fence and now you deny all knowledge of it.
Just for future reference, this forum is a written record, the things you post don't just disappear, they can be retrieved at any moment.
Also, learn how words work, it will be very useful for your research and when trying to convey your half-baked ideas.
For example, your notion that the person in the picture is stood directly next to the picket fence is utterly ludicrous. It is a truly half-baked notion, particularly as you have been shown multiple images of the area in question which demonstrate, beyond doubt, that there is nothing for anyone to stand on.
What you clearly don't grasp is that the person is a lot closer to you than you think. It's called "Perspective".
Not only do you need to learn how words work, you need to learn how perspective works.

I hope you've got enough to keep yourself busy there - lots to learn. It's good to keep your mind active at your clearly advanced age.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #48 on: October 27, 2023, 09:27:01 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2796
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #49 on: October 27, 2023, 01:52:50 PM »
You seem a bit befuddled Royell. This is from your Reply#34:

"...we also see the (N) end of the picket fence."

And this is from your Reply#40:

"Not only do we see the (N) end of the Picket Fence..."

You repeatedly reference seeing the end of the picket fence and now you deny all knowledge of it.
Just for future reference, this forum is a written record, the things you post don't just disappear, they can be retrieved at any moment.
Also, learn how words work, it will be very useful for your research and when trying to convey your half-baked ideas.
For example, your notion that the person in the picture is stood directly next to the picket fence is utterly ludicrous. It is a truly half-baked notion, particularly as you have been shown multiple images of the area in question which demonstrate, beyond doubt, that there is nothing for anyone to stand on.
What you clearly don't grasp is that the person is a lot closer to you than you think. It's called "Perspective".
Not only do you need to learn how words work, you need to learn how perspective works.

I hope you've got enough to keep yourself busy there - lots to learn. It's good to keep your mind active at your clearly advanced age.

    If I had meant the literal end of the fence, I would have explicitly said the VERY END of the fence.  My referencing the "(N) end of the fence" is akin to referencing the "(N) end of a town or block or state". This doesn't translate into "last house on the block" or the literal "boundary line" between towns or states or even countries.
    Regarding the "closeness" of this person on the picket fence in Towner 3, the picket fence is NOT close to that shelter opening/steps/abutment. And again, that individual is going to have to be positioned with his back to the camera. This means he would be standing SIDEWAYS on the Shelter Steps or Abutment. Placing this individual SIDEWAYS on the VERY top step would place a portion of his body INSIDE the shelter vs our seeing open space between him and the edge of the shelter on Towner 3. The lower you place this person on the shelter steps or even that abutment, the HIGHER you are throwing him up onto the picket fence in order to have the top of the picket fence at just above his knees. Keeping in mind the distance and upward projection you are claiming to move this individual via "perspective", instead brings to mind catapulting him up against the picket fence. Nonsensical.     
« Last Edit: October 27, 2023, 03:30:02 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline James Hackerott

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2023, 01:48:14 AM »
Marilyn Sitzman on S Pergola 2nd step 3D sims



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2023, 01:48:14 AM »


Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3160
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #51 on: October 28, 2023, 09:18:01 AM »
Marilyn Sitzman on S Pergola 2nd step 3D sims



And that's the end of that.
Great work, yet again, James.

Offline Michael Welch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #52 on: October 28, 2023, 12:08:41 PM »
And that's the end of that.
Great work, yet again, James.

Hi James and Dan, This is a man not a woman. He is not wearing a head scarf. Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #52 on: October 28, 2023, 12:08:41 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2796
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #53 on: October 28, 2023, 01:30:29 PM »

  As I continue to point out, Towner 3 shows the TOP of the picket fence/pickets to be just above the guy/kid's knees. The provided cartoon has those pickets almost waist high. And the knees clear up to the mid torso are leaning over/INSIDE the shelter, vs Towner 3 showing open space/a gap between the guy/kid's body and the Shelter. Why is a Sitzman knock-off being utilized here? I've never heard Sitzman talk of being in this position or viewed an image of her in this spot.   

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2796
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #54 on: October 28, 2023, 06:44:39 PM »

  Before you get to far along, I believe the 5.5" per fence board/picket is too large. More like 3.5"

Offline James Hackerott

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #55 on: October 28, 2023, 11:24:40 PM »


I'm going to try some 3D here but need some measurements, even if best guess. The "6'" in the graphic refers to the height of the figure standing on the sidewalk.

I've heard the fence height might be 4.5 feet high, but Cutler and 1981 "Topo Map" says it was five-feet high. I'm using the latter. I made the fence boards 5.5" wide, which is a dressed lumber width and have a 1/4" gap between them.



I believe, probably late 1990's or early-mid 2000 or so the original fence was completely removed, and later replaced. I think is was placed on the order of 4-5 inches distant from the original - at least on the eastern side. The Delarosa board, was active at that time. Maybe something in the usenet archives.
 
« Last Edit: October 29, 2023, 12:00:13 AM by James Hackerott »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Yet Another Shooter??
« Reply #55 on: October 28, 2023, 11:24:40 PM »